Copyright © 2000 - 2007 Printed and authorized by Joe Rossi 87 Findon Road, Woodville South 5011.

Said Prime Minister Bob Hawk said  No Child will live in poverty by 1990.
Result More Children live in poverty after 1990.
Said Prime Minister Paul Kitting said No the recession we had to have.
Result Australia near bankrupt in 2008
Said Prime Minister Paul Kitting said about abolishing Australian import duty should be reduced to zero.
Result Australia recession we had to have in 2008
Said Prime Minister Paul Kitting said Australia should compete into the world market.
Result Labor gives incentive packages to save jobs in Australia in 2008
Said Prime Minister Paul Kitting said Australia should have a GST.
Result Australia Labor States have double taxation on pay roll tax in 2008.
Said Prime Minister John Howard said Australia should have the same GST on all goods and services 10%..
Result Australia Labor States introduces other taxes such as coco pop , cigarette and petrol tax in 2008.
Questions  
Questions Prime Minister Kevin Rudd what other varied taxes does he want to introduce in the future?
Questions What was Prime Minister Kevin Rudd doing when campaigning at the last election(2007)?
Questions Why did Kevin Rudd not pick up the signs of recession before the election of 2007.
Questions Why did Kevin Rudd not pick up the signs that pensioners were struggling and needed $30 a week rise.
Questions Prime Minister Kevin Rudd can not protect children under 10 years of age.
Questions How can Prime Minister Kevin Rudd  protect adults over 18 years of age.
Questions How can Prime Minister Kevin Rudd  defend Australia of adults over 18 years of age.
Questions Prime Minister Kevin Rudd did not imagine the recession which was occurring during the election of 2007.
Questions How can Prime Minister Kevin Rudd  imagine the recovery we are to have during the election of 2013?
 
 

 

Below are Actual correspondence and reminder Notes without trying to indemnify individuals in child abuse case..

To: The Hon. Mark Butler, MP.

Minister for Mental Health and Aging.

My Local member of Port Adelaide.

PO Box 6022,

House of Representatives,

Parliament House,

Canberra ACT. 2600.           

 

From: Mr. Joseph Peter Rossi,

87 Findon Road,

Woodville South SA.                 5011.

Telephone 08-8243 0151

Mobile: 0409 8955 50,

Email: joerossi48@optusnet.com.au,

Web: jp-rossi-political-sa.info

 

 

Dated 09/11/2010.

Reference: Family Law Act.

 Dear Honourable Minister Butler, MP. 

 It has been over 12 months since I approached you about needed changes to the Australian Federal Family Law Act. There has already been in the past 2 years over 6 publically known child murders from the hands of violent vindictive parent.

 I have tried to be as unbiased as possible towards any gender father or mother.
I suggest the only solutions possible are as follows.
 

I am quite happy to come to your office and discuss these important current children problems.

 If you consider that the example below is accurate in detail. (I can assure it is). Could you conscience believe that the said children on probability be safe with the father and the environment your government may subject them to. Would you be happy if your children or grandchildren were in such am environment and what would you do about it?

 If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.

 In conclusion, I await your confirmation of receipt of this letter and also your considered reply.

 Thank you.

 Yours faithfully,

 Joseph Peter Rossi. Grandfather age 63 years. Local voter.

Get ride of children in a violent environment AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
Fix shared parenting of non-violent parents latter.

If the good parent can not protect the children in a marriage, how can that parent protect the child in anger, pay back revengeful separated environment? (Consider that)

 ==========  Following example is real  ==========

 Subject: Children under threat

 1)   The children between Violent parent, perpetrator, and I Victim Maternal grandfather were:

                                  i.          Ethan         DOB 09/01/2004.age 6

                                ii.          Bella          DOB 10/12/2005 age 5

                              iii.          Michaela   DOB 22/09/2007.age 3

                              iv.          Liarna       DOB 22/09/2007   age 3

 2)     Date of marriage separation 16/02/2008.
3)     Date of Children Family Court Final Order was on xx/xx/xx.
 4)     Violent parent, perpetrator, insisted and court agreed to:

                                  i.          Violent parent, perpetrator, has not followed court order item Number

             Regards Psychological treatment

a)     Supplying a Psychological treatment.

b)     He has not written to the children per court order dated.

c)     He did not inform me or allow the children to be comforted by me. After he rear car crashed with Ethan and Bella were in the car.

d)     Violent parent, perpetrator, has not kept me informed of his telephone contact details as reported by him in Mobile text dated 02/11/2010.

e)     Has not written to the children per court order dated.

f)       He has not returned the children access diary which he

Deliberately kept from December 2009 to now.

 5)     Violent parent, perpetrator, says the children need a father. That may be so.

                But not just a father. They need TO love, comfort, TO laughter WITH, encourage AND PLAY.

 a)     Something Violent parent, perpetrator, did not show TOWARDS Ethan and Bella when we were together. Violent parent,
        perpetrator, joined us at
        the playground. He would talk to his parents and friends on the mobile while the children entertained themselves on play equipment.
b)     After the birth of Bella Violent parent, perpetrator, did not show any love, comfort, laughter and was not prepared to listen
        during our marriage
         towards me or the children. He never woke up during the night to assist in looking after a sick child.

c)    
Violent parent, perpetrator, has not indicated in Text messages, correspondence, or Child excess centre comments after the
        final court order
        of April 2009. Any love, comfort, laughter behaviour.

 
g)    
Ethan has been noticed to by me, my parents and the Adelaide Child care Teachers bight on his tee shirts when stressed especially
        after contact with his father.

d)    
Violent parent, perpetrator,
made statements in his own court affidavits that he did believe in celebration of Christmas day with the
         extended family but contradicted himself in the first affidavit when he indicates he wanted my mother Annette Maternal grandmother to
         go home the day before Christmas day in Sydney 2006

e)    
I am quite confident that Violent parent, perpetrator, does quiz Ethan and Bella about the contacts they
       have with my parents.
   
(This is indicated by the comments the children make to me and particularly the comments violent parent, perpetrator, himself makes
     via text massages to me.

 6)     The Family Court implied that maternal grand parents should not interfere with a couple’s family or their conflict. Yet Violent parent,
         perpetrator, paternal grand parents have being doing just that with requesting mediation to see their grandchildren.

                                   i.          My parent Joseph Maternal grandfather did inform Mrs. Pam paternal grandmother in May 2007 that all parents get together to negotiate
                        the storm burring between violent parent, perpetrator, and me in the marriage. Mr. Alan replied that he would not interfere and if he (they)
                        could not see the grandchild so be it.
 

                         ii.          Violent parent, perpetrator, made statements in his own court
          affidavits that he believe that the maternal grandparents were not
          suited to look after the children because the Joe Maternal
          grandfather home was unsafe, too small and in a hostile
          environment. 

a)     The fact that with violent perpetrator 2 other siblings have had a similar marriage breaks up. 

b)     That with the ’s  2 other siblings in-laws have had the same harsh experiences as I with the counterpart equivalent in-laws

                 ` c)      The fact that Don ha Came ( nee ) did not allow her parents to discipline her children

                    d)     The fact that the paternal grandparents live on a farm with snakes, horses, and an insect as co-habitats makes the site unsafe for
                           unsupervised toddler visits.

                     e)     The fact that 2 other siblings’ counterpart in-laws have had the same harsh accusations and interference via the Adelaide Family Law
                           Court affidavits. This to me indicates that the paternal Grandparents may not be suitable to have the children with or without supervision
                            of the father my ex husband.

 7)     I Victim Bernadette  do hereby state based on my experience with Violent parent, perpetrator, over 9 years that :

                                   i.          Violent parent, perpetrator, like to criticize any member of his family siblings or parents
                         Or any extended family member. (His previous sibling’s in-laws)
                                ii.          Violent parent, perpetrator, likes to win at all costs arguments
                              iii.          Violent parent, perpetrator, likes to say what is politically correct but acts like a bully.
                    a)    
New South Wales Court records show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has been convicted the use of violence towards me.
                    b)    
South Australian Court records show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has driven passenger vehicle recklessly while his children were with him.
                    c)     
South Australian Court records show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has use threats to people
                    d)    
South Australian Family Law Court records will show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has misled, and manipulated the truth to the court.

                         e)     South Australian Family Law Court records do not show the Army posting orders on which the court made its final court orders on April 2009.
                          f)       
That Violent parent, perpetrator, made statements in his own court affidavits that he did believe in celebration of Christmas day with
                                 the extended family but contradicted himself in the first affidavit when he indicates he wanted my mother Annette Maternal grandfather
                                 to leave before I celebrated Christmas day with her.

                 8)    
I Victim Bernadette  do hereby finally state that I am very concerned about the safety and emotional conflicts influences Violent parent,
                        perpetrator, the father will have on the children without continual Psychological treatment for which Violent parent, perpetrator, has refused
                        to under go as per Court order of April 2009.

9)    The Former Husband, Mr. Violent parent, perpetrator, Sydney NSW   2.
 

10)  I Victim Bernadette do hereby give instruction to you my lawyer to:

                 a)                      Not negotiate with the other party lawyer.
                 b)                     
Not divulge particulars contained here in unless absolutely necessary in an affidavit.
                 c)                      
It is based on the perceptions and experience that lawyers do deals
                                Behind the scenes without the knowledge of the litigants (clients). 

I Victim Bernadette do hereby finally repeat and stress that I am very concerned about the safety and emotional infliction on the children by the father.

It is not an argument on adult freedom or parent’s rights of violent parent, perpetrator, or me, but the safety of children first and foremost. Violent parent, perpetrator, has a split personality. One minute he is calm when he gets his way and next he is in a rage and violent when he is challenged.

If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.

In conclusion, I await your confirmation of receipt of this letter and also your considered reply.

 Yours sincerely

(Maternal grandfather): ==========, ==========, ==========,

 ==========,==========,==========,==========,==========

11)                     If going to court again put in the Court documents

Emails:

                                  i.          from Violent parent, perpetrator, dated 10/10/2007Just in case you

Did not

          Get the message last night

                                ii.          From Joe Maternal grandfather to his father (paternal grandfather)

Allan dated 03/12/2007 

          Asking for their help.

State in Victim Affidavits that:

a)     Violent parent, perpetrator, the father and applicant.

b)     Victim (nee Maternal grandfather the mother and respondent.

c)     Violent parent, perpetrator, is a habitual lyre.

d)     He did not inform his Employer of his Family Court Order status.

e)     Violent parent, perpetrator, did not inform his treating Psychologist of the Family Court Order treatment required.

f)       Violent parent, perpetrator, did not supply his treating Psychologist report to the wife according to Final Family Court Order due June 2010.

g)     Violent parent, perpetrator, did not show any improvement of Anger management.

h)     Violent parent, perpetrator, did not corresponded to his former wife Victim  vie the Post Office Box address as agreed instead corresponded mostly by mobile Phone text massages on issues that were not urgent..

i)        Violent parent, perpetrator, did not inform and supply medical records after the vehicle accident in which he with children Ethan and Bella were involved.

j)        Violent parent, perpetrator, did not supply the motor vehicle accident report to the children’s mother Victim  after the vehicle accident in which he with children Ethan and Bella were involved.

k)     Violent parent, perpetrator, did not inform or invite the children’s mother Victim to the hospital after the vehicle accident in which he with children Ethan and Bella were involved.

 12)                     Comparing father Paternal Grand Father and his son
                Violent parent, perpetrator of violent actions.

 a)                      Paternal Grand Father kicked his wife’s parents out of his home.
        b)                     
Son Violent parent kicked his wife’s parents out of his home.
        c)                      
Paternal Grand Father wife’s has a fractured eye socket
        d)                     
Son Violent parent wife was punched in the eye and received a Broken eye socket.
        e)                     
Paternal Grand Father Son has an emotional mental problem.
        f)
            Son Violent parent has a son Ethan with an Emotional mental problem.
        g)                     
Paternal Grand Father children have a social assimilation  problem.
        h)          
Paternal Grand Father  own Son and now the Violent parent  has eldest children Ethan and Bella have a social Assimilation problem.

 13)                     That Violent parent, perpetrator, deliberately and intentionally did not want grandparents involved in independently and
                        unsupervised excess to the children under any circumstances
.
                (Refer to Violent parent, perpetrator, affidavit notes about grandparent Joe Maternal grandfather)

 14)           That Violent parent, perpetrator, deliberately put a court order to make me stay in Adelaide. Violent parent, perpetrator,
                    has been working in Sydney New South Wales. So why should the restraining order on me be current. I like that removed so I may seek
                    work and living quarters as is necessary.

 ==========,==========,==========,==========,==========

 15)                     Reasons for Maternal Grandparent to get involved in Family Court Affidavits.

         a)                      It is not about interfering in proceedings.

b)                      It is not about putting false allegations.

c)                       It is about protecting little defenceless children

               Against violent parents.

d)                       It is about perceptions of lawyers doing deal behind the scenes

Without the knowledge of the litigants (clients)

e)                      It is about having had experience with similar violent

               Parents since a teenage.

f)             It is about Mr. Violent parent, perpetrator, having had his father

Take no interest in reconciliation to keep the marriage together when conflict between the couple first arose.

                                                              i.      Mr. Alan has 7 children of which 3 have had a marriage divorce with children being involved.

                                                            ii.      That the sibling oldest brother Sea on since and during the separation with Jennifer has made similar accusations, innuendoes in the Adelaide Family Court Affidavits.

                                                          iii.      That the sibling oldest sister Don ha (nee Came since and during the separation with Scott has made similar accusations, innuendoes in the Adelaide Family Court Affidavits.

                                                           iv.      That now currently violent parent, perpetrator, since and during the separation with Victim Bernadette (nee maternal grandfather) has made similar accusations, innuendoes in the Adelaide Family Court Affidavits.

 ==========,==========,==========,==========,==========

 16)                     Lawyer instructions way to argue for issues on mother's behalf.

a)                      What ever violent parent, perpetrator, wants I want in reciprocation.

b)                      .What ever violent parent, perpetrator, and wants for his parents I want For my parents.

c)                       Would like the Court orders to remain as they are. No changes.

                    i.)                    If changes are forced upon me then:

                            ii.)            What Violent parent, perpetrator, and demands for his parents I

Demand for my parents.

(Equal rights what is good for the goose is good for the Gander.).

                          iii.)            Father’s parents not to have unsupervised visits with grandchildren

        unless:-

1)     The family court assesses the property for safety environment first.

2)      The family court assess the family court documents of Father’s siblings divorce affidavits of Donna Cameron and Sean  regarding similarity in harassment, allegations and similar children excess conditions.

3)     Quotes from Aussie Kids November 2010 Parenting Publication issue page 5.

 If you were luck enough to have good parents who resolved conflict well, on which you‘ve been able to model your own behaviour then that’s great…. Learn to vent anger in a healthy way developing listening skills, taking care with how you frame statements or feelings and learning to talk constructively about your problems can help … Given that kids mirror and learning ground in life, it’s imperative that we learn to communicate and solve conflict respectfully.

However negative and destructive behaviour is also passed down within families.

So as to assess the bona fide moral argument put forward by violent parent, perpetrator, and family standards.

4)     Army Motto state: Information is on a need to know bases.

Mother's motto is there for the same.
17)  Violent parent, perpetrator, argued in the last court hearing that he had no extra money to share in the costs of swimming activities
        of the children because of his car debts over 2 years. I am spending $15 each child 26 weeks a year
Total $    1,560.00

             18)  My question is where has he got the money to challenge me at this court hearing? Possible answer is his parents. If so then the court did instruct
                   
my father that grand parents should stay out of the proceedings.

                 19)  I the Victim Bernadette  do hereby finally state that I am very concerned about the safety and emotional conflicts influences
                        Violent parent, and perpetrator, the father will have on the children without continual Psychological treatment for which Violent parent,
                        perpetrator, has refused to under go as per Court order of April 2009.

 It is not an argument on adult freedom or parent’s rights of violent parent, perpetrator, or me, but the safety of children first and foremost. Violent parent, perpetrator, has a split personality. One minute he is calm when he gets his way and next he is in a rage and violent when he is challenged.

==========,==========,==========,==========,==========

20)  Traits, Profile call it what you will:

                                  i.          Violent parent, perpetrator, DOB 10/01/1974, Violent, quick Tempered, twists the truth, self interested, and wants to win at all

Costs does not give opinions when opposing views. Does not assess argumentative debates.

                                ii.          Violent parent, perpetrator.

                              iii.          Narcissist. Excessive, self admiration, Personality disorder, self directed sexual desire.

                              iv.          Violent parent, perpetrator, use of words Antonyms with opposite meaning To his actions or behaviour.

                                v.          Ethan has missing 4th Gene in DNA Chromosome.

                              vi.          Bella is a loner. Likes school,

                            vii.          Michaela  Thinker, wants to achieve spastic

                          viii.          Liarna  Quick learner, happy, wants to try every thing, Sulks.

                              ix.          Violent parent, perpetrator, Partner Grandfather was admitted To Julia Farr

          Hospital. (Why) Mental disorder.

                                x.          Violent parent, perpetrator, accused Joe Maternal grandfather My father of being Domineering, violent, bashing, controlling,

No fence constraining children excess to main road. Small house, when in fact he was referring to his own traits.

==========,==========,==========,==========,==========

                        It is not an argument on adult freedom or rights, but the safety of children first and foremost.

 21)             Violent parent, perpetrator, Requests

Has informed me (objected to me)

                                  i.          Not to contact his Army Psychologist.

                                ii.          Non of my business about his place of abode or home telephone  Number.

                              iii.          Has approached the Bella Kindy regards his parent attended

          There. I arranged and gave permission but either violent parent, Perpetrator, did not

          Inform them or the parents did not attend the Kindy at the arranged Day.

                               iv.          Violent parent, perpetrator, has requested additional whole week Access to Ethan and

Bella only and not the children Michaela and Liarna.

                                 v.          Violent parent, perpetrator, has requested additional access to Ethan and Bella only and

Not the children Michaela and Liarna.

                               vi.          Violent parent, perpetrator, has refused to take up the Wednesday Thursday children

Access as per court order.

22)             Victim now Requests

                                  i.          Would like the Court orders to remain as they are. No changes

                                ii.          that I am very concerned about the safety and

Emotional infliction on the children by the father

                              iii.           Violent parent, perpetrator, the father must continual

Psychological treatment for which Violent parent, perpetrator,

Has refused to under go as per Court order of April 2009.

                              iv.          That the restraining order on me to remain in Adelaide be

Removed so that I may seek work and living quarters as is necessary.

Violent parent, perpetrator, has been working in Sydney New South Wales.

                                v.          That Father’s parents not to have unsupervised visits with grandchildren unless:-

The family court assesses the property for Safety environment first

                              vi.          That Violent parent, perpetrator, pays contribution to the costs

Of swimming activities of the children because of his car

Debts for 2 years. I am spending $15 each child 26 weeks a year

Total $    1,560.00

========== End of Lawyer instruction ==========

 

Dictionary Meanings

Harass, annoy, bother, pursue >
Bombast,   bluster, posturing >
Controlling, scheming, calculating >
Intimidate, frighten, bully, terrorize >
Molesting, molest >Threatening>

Politicians are Aiding, Abetting, Condone, overlook, forgive, have disregard, Consorting, Encourage and are Accomplice to child abuse by their inaction or willingness to correct the problem.

 

 Violent parent, perpetrator paid for the dogs in a kennel but can not contribute for the children’s swimming.

1,

Dog Fees $15

a day

Oct 6 to Oct 31, 2010

25 times 30

$750.00

 

 

 

 

 

 Reference Reading Journals or Books

1,

Aussie Kids Parenting Publication

Web Site www.aussiekids.net.au

 

2,

Reference Reading

 

.

 

3,

Reference Reading

Aussie Kids November 2010 issue

Page 5.Paragraph 7 & 12 Solving Conflict

4,

Reference Reading

Aussie Kids November 2010 issue

Page 7.all Paragraphs
Mood changes effected by body chemicals.

 I say that item 6 effects and relates to both children and adults alike.

 Quotes from Aussie Kids November 2010 Parenting Publication issue page 5.

 If you were luck enough to have good parents who resolved conflict well, on which you‘ve been able to model your own behaviour then that’s great…. Learn to vent anger in a healthy way developing listening skills, taking care with how you frame statements or feelings and learning to talk constructively about your problems can help … Given that kids mirror and learning ground in life, it’s imperative that we learn to communicate and solve conflict respectfully.

….. However negative and destructive behaviour is also passed down within families.

Worst people in my opinion, I have come in contact.
Works at Holsworthy Barracks.

 

Narcissist. Excessive, self admiration, personality disorder, self directed sexual desire
Violent parent, perpetrator, uses words Antonyms with opposite meaning to his actions or behaviour.

 

It is about perceptions of lawyers getting paid win or lose. and to the lawyers it is just a game of chess.

 ========== Here after are Quotes only ==========

  1. Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia references

==========,==========,==========,==========,==========

The cause of multiple personality is not clearly understood, but the condition seems almost invariably to be associated with severe physical abuse and neglect in childhood. It is believed that amnesia, the key to formation of the separate personalities, occurs as a psychological barrier to seal off unbearably painful experiences from consciousness. The disorder often occurs in childhood but may not be recognized until much later. Social and psychological impairment ranges from mild to severe. The primary treatment is psychotherapy to help the individual integrate the separate personalities.

========== Argument for change to the Law. ==========

Victim Bernadette Violent parent, perpetrator, John Grand parents Alan and Pamela

What is potential or real in the following topics? i am trying to argue the case by examples that the 

LISTED PROFESSIONALS NEED QUALIFICATION AND VERIFICATION TO DO THE TASKS.

But Violent parents are not required to under go rehabilitation, or examination to be verified they can supervise children
without temper tantrum, or resorting to uncontrolled physical or mental assault on small children.

1,

Potential, Possible, likely, capability, aptitude.

 

2,

Engineer, coax,
Lawyer, legal representative, brief, attorney
Builders License, certify, permit, dispensation,

Drivers license,

Psychologist,

 

 

 

3,

Driving a car under the influence of drugs 0.05,
Do all drivers under the influence have a crash? No but potential.

 

4,

Running a red light camera, Do all driver beating red cameras have a crash. No but potential.

 

 

 

5,

A parent s/he has a right to access his/her child no matter with Psychological disorders.

 

6,

The family Law Court can not force a person to under go Psychological assessment.

 

 

 

7,

Do all car Drivers without a license have a crash. No but potential. 

 

8,

Small toys potential to swallow or chock child under 3 Do all such toys chock child under 3.   No but have the potential.

 

 

 

 

 Reference: Progression of Violent Parent.

1,

Was quite well mannered person originally. Till the birth of the first child.

 

2,

Did physically and emotionally assault his wife.

 

 

 

3,

Did emotionally assault and make life threats towards his father-in-law.

 

4,

Did emotionally assault and mentally disturb his son Ethan and daughter Bella while the 2 parents shared the family home.

 

 

 

5,

Did emotionally and mentally disturb his son Ethan and daughter Bella while car passengers in the car that he recklessly drove into the rear of another car Making his car a complete right off.

 

6,

Has continually emotionally threatened his wife since the marriage separation and divorce.

 

 

 

 

 Yet the hypocritical politicians still require this same person to have unsupervised free access to the children without

1,

Temper tantrum education.

 

2,

Without supervised medication

 

3,

Without a certified Psychologist, report.

 

 Why.

1,

Because the law making politicians are inconsistent in law A un road worthy vehicle has the potential to be in accidents but a habitual violent parent has to commit an actual offence of violence to the children. Hard to prove without being present to witness the act.

 

2,

The history of violence by the parent or extended family members is not taken into consideration because the politicians may lose the persons vote at elections.

 

3,

The child is not significant a voter to be protected.

 

4,

Potential child bashing is not a fact or contributing to treasurer revenue rising.

 

 ¨      Where is the profiling of violent parents within the Family Law Courts or Psychologists? A must to do the right thing for the
     Australian Attorney General podium media high moral motto in legislation “what is best for the Children.”

¨     
There are for everything else.  

 

To: The Hon. Mark Butler, MP.
Minister for Mental Health and Aging.
My Local member of Port Adelaide.
PO Box 6022,
House of Representatives,
Parliament House,
Canberra ACT. 2600.
           

 

From: Mr. Joseph Peter Rossi,
87 Findon Road,

Woodville South SA.  5011.
Telephone 08-8243 0151

Mobile: 0409 8955 50,

Email: joerossi48@optusnet.com.au,
Web: jp-rossi-political-sa.info

 

 Reference: Family Law Act.                                                            Dated 04/11/2010

 Dear Honourable Butler, MP.  

 It has been over 12 months since I approached you about needed changes to the Australian Federal Family Law Act.
There has already been in the past 2 years over 6 publically known child murders from the hands of violent vindictive parent.

 Being as unbiased as possible towards any gender father or mother. I suggest the only solutions possible are as follows.

  (Facts 1)

1)     There has been and are many parents, especially fathers who lobby for equal access to their children.

2)     There has been and are many fathers who through no fault of their own but by women scorn that have been denied access to their children.

3)     There has been and are many fathers who have been violent to the wife and children due to the belief of ownership of the family members.

4)     There has been and are many fathers and mothers equally who have been violent to the children due to a narcissist attitude or genetic make up.

5)     There have been many acts of cruelty as well as murders of children by violent parents having unsupervised court sanctioned access to the children.

 (Facts 2)

1)     This is a very contentious issue where there is no clear winner as to which parent is the least violent to have custardy of the children. Assuming that no one thinks ahead for 2 or more years. Or from Childhood to parenthood.

1)      The solution can only be fact finding based on a long history searching for bad behaviors. of a particular person to evaluate access to the children should therefore be limited based on the best accurate probability of repeated bad behaviors. (Leopard never changes its spots.) Persons could not plan, manipulate, or copy bad violent behavior towards each other over such a long period of time. Near impossible unless in built characteristics.

2)      The changes can not be based on gender bias as it affects equally the fathers as well as the mothers.

3)      The behavior of children is directly related to copying acts and thoughts from parents.

 (Facts 3) What changes must be made to improve the current Family Law Act.

1)     That the Courts Magistrates and Judges be given more power to cross examine individual parents directly in child custody cases.

2)     That lawyers be band from litigation in court of children access issues.

It is not an argument on violent parent adult freedom or rights, but the safety of children first and foremost.

3)     That all primary school to adulthood criminal history or violent behavior of both the parents be accessible by the Family Courts in regards to educational and medical history.  The aim that the parent with the most criminal behavior and excess drug, alcohol and violent tendencies lose access and custody rights of the children.

4)     That the family Courts also keep and investigate the records of other Family members (Parents, Grandparents and siblings, in Family Court Affidavits for consistencies or irregularities brought before the court, that may help ascertain the facts or potential of which parent the children will be the better to have custody under.  Aim to choose the parent with the best history potential to be given full custody (guardianship) of the children in relation to up bringing.

 Aim: To change the current Family Law Act.

a)                     Break the cycle of violence from violent parent to child.

b)                     Less legal costing to passive parent.

c)                      Less ability to use vendetta by narcissist parent.

d)                     Less ability for the dominant parent to fudge, manipulates, and fabricates evidence to the detriment of the children.

e)                     The children will have less emotional distress to carry into adult hood by not being associated weekly from bickering parents.

f)                        To reduce the number of instances where the dominate parent uses continual financial advantage, threats, Intimidation, physical and or emotional assaults, potentially from a child age 1 to 12 (continually for some 11 years).

g)                     It will take away the perceived legal right to litigation by a violent parent.

h)                      It will give forward standards of behaviour to potential parents who love challenging authority (governments, Courts, Police, School teachers, sexual partners) by past and future bad violent behaviour.

 I am quite happy to come to your office and discuss these important current children problems.

 If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.

 In conclusion, I await your confirmation of receipt of this letter and also your considered reply. I note that your office tool over 6months to respond
    or acknowledge my concerns.

 Thank you.

 Yours faithfully, Joe Rossi, Maternal Grand father, age 63. Campaigner for Changing the Australian Family Law Act

For which Premier Rann, Prime Minister Gillard  the Australian Attorney General podium media high moral motto in legislation
“what is best for the Children.” .Which the courts, money hungry lawyers and our protectors (the parliamentarians) have no moral, no conscience, no balls to intervene to stopping the circle of violence towards children. Children do not vote so why intervene and lose the votes of the parents.