This site, Topics, 84 to 92.
<>
.Another site, Old Media releases Topics, 01 of 83.==========,========== Topic In defence of Joe Rossi Advertiser articles.==========,==========
http://web.archive.org/web/20011026003058/www.crikey.com.au/politics/olsen.html
|
The unluckiest politician in Australia |
|
by
Charles Cameron Kingston |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_district_of_Lee
http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=15240The Parliament of Tasmania has been hung!
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
I quote- Note that “In his four years in Parliament, [former member for Lee Joe] Rossi attracted more headlines than is normal for a little known backbencher, producing ideas for innovative schemes such as sterilising unmarried mothers after their third child, or introducing a modern version of poor houses for welfare recipients.” Awesome! Sadly, Rossi’s innovative thinking has, like Communism, again been repudiated by the voters of Lee.
http://www.pollbludger.com/sa2006/lee.htm I quote- The traditional Labor seat of Albert Park (the suburb of that name is now in Cheltenham to the east) when it was abolished before the 1993 election, at which it was possibly the Liberal Party's most unlikely win. The accidental one-term member was Joe Rossi, an advocate of what Antony Green describes as "innovative policy ideas such as sterilising unmarried mothers after the third child, or introducing a modern version of poor houses for welfare recipients". By former Independent Weekly columnist Alex Kennedy reported. He (Rossi) is also remembered for being thrown out of parliament for walking into the chamber eating a pie. Lee inevitably returned to the Labor fold in 1997, and their hold was solidified by a 9.6 per cent swing in 2006. (A further swing 2006.) Making LEE a safe Labor seat of 20.4%
Joe Rossi in 1993 state election a swing to him was Australian Labor Party Kevin Hamilton +9.10%
Joe Rossi in 1997 state election a swing from him was Australian Labor Party Michael Wright -9.60%
The swing to Labor of 9.6 per cent was roughly average for Adelaide, but slightly lower than might have been expected given that Labor's primary vote was up 12.2 per cent and the Liberals' down 10.8 per cent
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
http://web.archive.org/web/20011026003058/www.crikey.com.au/politics/olsen.html
|
The unluckiest politician in Australia |
|
by
Charles Cameron Kingston |
I quote- Then there was Joe Rossi, a moronic slob preselected for being a party timeserver in what everyone considered an unwinnable seat, who was carried in on the tide. They ranged across the factional gamut, of course, but Brown kept the ineffectual and mild mannered John Meir on as whip.
No-one ever sat down and read the riot act to them. No-one even told them how MPs should behave – about the only time Rossi came to public attention was when the Speaker threw him out after he walked into the Chamber munching on a pie.
No-one ever told them that the best way for them to stay there was for them to work their electorates but otherwise shut up and do what they were told. (What does he mean – community leaders to act like zombies?)
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
Such notoriety did not help Rossi retain his seat, defeated by an 8.1% swing at the 1997 election. Election 2006 Labor hold swing +9.8
Election 1997 Liberal Joe Rossi 8023 Alp Michael Wright 10666.
Election 1997 Liberal John Olsen 9691, Alp Robert Kieselbach 3686.
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
I now refer you to
Sterilise child-abusing parents, says former ombudsman | News.com.au
... child abuse should be forced to have sterilisations, a former Victorian ombudsman says. ... By whose standards do you judge. read the real BOOK. Mel Posted at ...
news.com.au/national/... - 80k
Call to sterilise parents who abuse kids | TimeBase
Former Victorian Obudsman has stated that parents with abusive history towards ... services, says the systemic failings of state care in Victoria has forced him to ...
timebase.com.au/topics/2010/.../call-sterilise-parents-who-abuse-kids - Cached
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
I would rather have the above one sided derogative comments about me than have supported and voted for Premier Mike Rann in the March 2010 election. A further swing to Labor in 2006 and 2010. What does it say about the media interpretation of the South Australian Voters and biased media coverage of major party muted candidates instead of stating the goals of all candidates? I spent $2,000.00 in 2010 election compared to major parties of some $50,000.00. All used to cover the two Leaders Rann and Redmond. All the other major party candidates being zombies. As regards poor houses. Premier Don Dunstan recommended large brown paper bags with plastic wrapping for homeless in Hurtle Square or something like that.
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
What does one expect? The children copy the parent’s behavior. The Government department heads copy their leader Rann. Rann ignores the SA Constitution, morality, the people and the opposition. So why not Family SA also ignore the Law, the children and its responsibilities. The person responsible in Family SA. Should be jailed if not complying at the next hearing.
Angle Park, the Parks on Crime
Ms. Isobel Redmond MP, Leader of the Opposition hosted on 28/10/2010 at the Parks Community Centre the second community crime meeting. The first was held in the Salisbury area. A Salisbury Council member was deeply offended to hear that Salisbury area was the head of the Crime district in Adelaide. Let’s look at the suburbs that the bike gangs have their fortresses. All in Labor held Seats. Rann, Foley and used to be Atkinson. To solve crime one must go back to when crime was minimum. One should implement as many legal steps as were at that time. I.e. Similar judges, similar police attitudes, similar jail terms etcetera. More local Justice of Peace on bench, more Honoree wardens for Fisheries and National Parks etcetera. In the army of 1970's one did campus finding and destination. The main motto was if one got lost, one should go back to a recognized location and start again. Offensive car drivers compelled to attend hospital wards to witness victims first hand. What are the rest of the Labor silent politicians doing to stop it? If Labor gags the back bench, gags the local school principals and police. What chances have we for democracy and self protection? NIL, Zero, and Buckley.
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
I like to draw the readers to the hypocrisy and dishonest reporting by the Adelaide Newspaper media as follow: A letter I sent to
To The Editor, Crikey, Level 7, 22 William St, Melbourne VIC 3000, 23 October 2010
Reference: Personal attack on Joseph Peter Rossi. I have read your Code of Conduct. In short it says “we ask that people ‘play the ball not the man’., More specifically, we reserve the right to edit or delete comments which are offensive, make personal attacks or could expose us to legal action.”. In your article about me Joe Rossi it states By Charles Cameron Kingston, Crikey's Adelaide Correspondent, Wrote "Then there was Joe Rossi, a moronic slob preselected." I did not eat a pie in Parliament House. I am not a moron. I did get a swing against me in the 1997 state election but was 12th the least swing out of 49 seats. I was not and am not a slob.
I consider the article is totally opposite to your code of conduct displayed on the web.
Dictionary meanings
Moron:
a former term for somebody with significant learning difficulties
and impaired social skills, now considered offensive
Slob: someone who is lazy or untidy, a person with a poor standard of hygiene or manners.
Poor manners is being a lyier or dishonest to the people at election time.
It does not mean not speaking out for what is wrong.
It does not mean do nothing to protect children from abuse.
Politicians are there for thinking of options to improve matters. thinking of options to improve matters. Is that laziness, then so be it.
==========,========== End of Topic ==========,==========
Mr. Rann says he wants to get tough on crime. Mr. Rann says he wants to get tough school literacy and numeracy. Well Rann is poor on economics and numeracy. Why?
One criminal needs one police officer to catch him, one judge to punish the criminal and one jailer to keep the criminal in jail.
One child needs one mother to have it and a whole village to educate it.
Rann is taking away the judges, the jailers and letting the criminals go.
Rann is taking away the parents responsibilities, reducing the teachers quality and quantity from the children and letting the students become self educated and practise self survival on the way to become criminals.
Go back to Ireland Rann and take Foley with you.
I am becoming to believe that only Australian born citizens should be politicians.
Immigrant politicians are people that other countries rejected.
(Like the John West Fish can commercial)
Rann when are you going to get out of people lives and concentrate of state issues.
,==========, other’s views ,==========,
The anti development group from Mount Barker should get together with those against development at Seaford Heights, Roseworthy, Concordia, Buckland Park and the Save our Suburbs group should get together to come up with a solution. Those who want population to stop think of this. For every 10 people we have 6 workers paying tax. When the baby boomers retire you will have 4 tax payers for every 10 people. As people get older they drain the health system. We need skilled worked to support this, that is why the health system is draining more funds than ever and increasing every year more than double the CPI.
Apposing view to need solutions, above.
During the 1950’s to 1990’s we have steady progress in government infrastructure and birth rate and employment. Every 10 years we got a hick up of rising unemployment of 1 year or so duration. Cost of living kept up with ability to save. During the 21 st century we have continual rise in population outstripping housing construction, which causes continual continue bad construction of housing and continual rises in house prices which outstrips the workers ability to save for affordable housing. Immigrants interfere with the existing population in sharing the GDP, let alone keeping up with CPI.
Knocking down good existing school buildings and replace with the new is a waste and irresponsible. Hospital could well do with that same money.
Long term Politicians become immune, sensitized from hearing and speech communication from voters. Long term Politicians become immune, sensitized from financial hardship, and community crimes as they are protected 24/7 by the police. Long term Politicians become perfectionists in Toast Master debates (putting apposing view for the sack of it_) that they have apposed each other so often that they no longer know when they lie and when they do not. SA Premier Rann does not listen. Only one way to get politicians to listen is to communicate by physical example. Mr. Kevin Foley the SA Treasurer with a smirk on his face when questioned in Parliament shows contempt and has been reported to me by some voters that he is unbearable sight. As the treasurer get a big head, becomes more aloof, and dictatorial I have a vision like Martin Luther King, that Foley will end up like Dictator Julius Caesar did not listen and got assassinated by his own man. Dictator Mussolini did not listen and got assassinated by his own people. Dictator Hitler did not listen and assassination attempts were made by his own Generals when the voters of South Australia have had enough. Only then were solutions to democracy achieved for a generation till bad memories were lost. I like to be like what William Shakespeare poem said. " They also serve who stand and wait." vigilant but not alarmed.
I have a 32 month grand daughter. She just copies everything she sees other adults and children do. No questions asked. So too I say the criminals do when they learn the rewards they get from Judges, politicians and the community give out little or no punishment. Teen ager criminals get a free holiday accommodation to a beach shack as rehabilitation before the good behaviour probation period. Adult criminals get immunity from community shame by judge’s suppression of names. (Privacy act, children identity etcetera). The Good Samaritan has to pay hundred of dollars a week for holiday accommodation, gets fined by state governments for car driving and parking offences, gets home invaded, gets no sympathy from judges, and gets charged income taxes by federal Government, If all above fails the Good Samaritan get ripped off by a married partner and their lawyer in relationship breakups. Judges give the wrong messages to criminals. Instead of having sympathy for victims, judges show bleeding heart for the criminals. Shame, Shame, Shame.
To Whom ever Reader it may Concern.
Failure to do anything about the following. Dictionary Meanings
|
Aim |
Endeavour, inspire, direct |
|
Principal |
Fundamental, basic, primary |
|
Enforce |
Implement, Impose , insist, inflict |
|
Message |
Meaning, point, implications |
|
Impression |
Thought , impact, influence, dent, effect |
Directed at Journalists, the Law enforcing Officers, Opposition Politicians refusing to raise question in Parliament put by electors . Also directed to State and Federal Court Judges and Magistrates.
I like to point out the above dictionary meanings and the effects that are a consequence of law in this country.
It is imperative that we all fight for an aim in life and stand by the principals of civil interactions to sustain human life and freedom.
The fact that the media does not print any allegations of broken principals of our politicians gives the message to law abiding persons that honesty does not pay.
The fact that the media does not print any allegations of broken principals of our politicians gives the message to flirting criminal abiding persons that dishonesty does pay and should be repeated more frequently.
Not much different to identifying and treating cancer cells in the human body. This is cancer outside the human body with similar identical drastic effect.
Yours sincerely,
Callers for Help from South Australian Election Candidates March 2010. Fall on Deaf hears
Joe Rossi.
220510
23rd.March 2010.
.
To: The Police Commissioner, Police of South Australia,
Adelaide SA 5000.
Reference: Reported to me that police can not approach children at front door of their home without parents being present.
Dear Sir,
I have been concerned about school bullying and domestic violence for some 47 years.
In the past 20 years school bullying has got considerably worse effecting not only low socio-economic schools but across the whole spectrum of schools...
In my investigations with police officers I have been told that the police as parents or not are by regulations not allowed to approach children who are alleged to be bullies, at their home or elsewhere.
Is this rumour or fact?
If true fact why is it the case?
What section of the police Act and or Regulation can I refer to? I have asked the Port Adelaide Police to quote the section but have not had time to respond while I waited.
Yours sincerely
Joe Rossi
Posted 230310.
I had problems with school bullying with my children. I approached the teacher who did nothing.
I approached the school Principal who did nothing. I asked for the address of the particular bully students, and the Principal read out the Privacy Act.
I followed the students home after school. I knocked on the door. A bully child answered, recognized me. He said promise me you will not tell my parents and we will leave your children alone.
It was done. Problem solved.
How come an uneducated, low person like me can get results and a police officer had his own child bullied and commits suicide.
Answer. We are police officers not allowed to approach children informally at their home without the presence of a guardian or parent.
To which I say crap. Police approach children when lost at Royal Show, or in the streets.
An officer rang me on 24/03/2010 about midday, said no such legislation exists. No need to put it in writing. I said I need and request it in writing so that I can show to police officers the fact. Or I can use it to pursue changes to legislation with the politicians. Got letter confirming discussion but not its contents dated 07/04/2010?
No reply received from Police Minister, Police Officer Port Adelaide, or Police Commissioner as at 19/05/2010 11.00.
Internet Censorship.
Originally there were town criers. Central town watering hole and every one could express their views.
Then came the local town newspaper printing. Censorship was only possible town by town views of the newspaper owners. Then came the money owner corporatist that set up city or state newspaper printing. Money and number of newspaper groups controlled what information was disseminated into the community.
In Australia there are only three newspaper printers. In most cases there is only one newspaper per Australian State.
In Adelaide the Adelaide Advertiser did not disseminate the views of all South Australian March 2010 state election candidates. This I consider proof that there is today and now effective political censorship.
Like the GST tax arguments (debates) on cooked or uncooked food before legal introduction. It was considered to apply to on all goods and services products without exceptions. Less than 2 years after introduction tobacco and wine taxes disparity again commenced to be law.
Unless the internet filtering censorship laws are introduced there must be an Australian Constitution clause unable to be changed by any political person but by referendum that all Australian citizens have a right to freedom of political expression on the internet service providers.
We can not trust political politicians aspiring to be little Australian Adolf Hitler’s
To: The Federal Member for Port Adelaide,
Mark.Butler.MP@aph.gov.au Also copy to Senator Penny Wong.
Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600.
From: Joseph Peter Rossi,
8th.May 2010.
Reference: Tobacco Tax.
Dear Mr. Mark. Butler.MP.
I like to draw your attention to some History.
Introduction:
(1) Most white, (European), brown (Africans) and yellow (Chinese and American Indians) tribe civilization of humans have had smoking as a culture.
(2) Smoking, alcohol, gambling, and prostitution have been inexistence since man was created.
(3) There was smoke inhalation from fires in caves,
i. bush fires,
ii. cooking food around camp fires
iii. warming from fire places
iv. around the 20th century there was open fire smoke from copper water heaters
v. kerosene fridges,
vi. kerosene room heaters
Just to mention a few and people still lived to an old age.
(4) Affordability for such visas has always been expensive. In Europe in the 1930’s people smoked potatoes leaves mixed with walnut leaves to smoke. Soldiers of war used to sell their own rifles for a cigarette.
(5) In the United States there was Alcohol embargos that could not be stamped out by governments.
Present failure of Australian Governments.
(1) Present Federal Labor Government can not stop murders of adults and children caused by driver under the influence of Alcohol.
(2) Present Federal Labor Government can not stop murders of adults and children caused by adults distributing Cocaine, or amphetamines.
(3) Present Federal Labor Government can not stop murders of children caused by internet twitter bullying.
(4) Present Federal Labor Government can not stop murders of children caused by adult violent parents under the Family Law Act.
The winners of Labor politician regime have and will be again the money hungry politician and the selfish adult parents who still indulge in the visas of smoking, alcohol, poker machine gambling, and prostitution, in that order.
The losers have been and will be the defenceless breast feeding children, the primary school children, the passive parent, and the poor.
Recommendations would be:
(1) Present Governments Labor or Liberal impose banns on the sale of tailor made cigarettes of any kind.
i. This would reduce pollution of cigarette buts in public places, rivers and the environment.
ii. This would reduce the number of chemicals arterially put into tobacco products by scrupulous manufacturers.
(2) Allow tobacco as is at present and encourage the use or reusable cigarette holder filter combined.
i. This would reduce pollution of cigarette buts in public places, rivers and the environment.
ii. This would reduce the number of chemicals artificially put into tobacco products by scrupulous manufacturers.
(3) To avoid the growing of private use tobacco plants so as to avoid added chemicals added by growers against pesticides and addiction chemicals
i. This would reduce pollution of cigarette buts in public places, rivers and the environment.
ii. This would reduce the number of chemicals artificially put into tobacco products by scrupulous manufacturers.
iii. The smoker would know exactly what was in the tobacco.
iv. The smoker would not need to deprive his /her children from food or shelter for expensive personal bad habits.
v. The smoker would not need to grow other more dangerous weed like marijuana, poppies, and other chemically laboratory mental twisting drugs.
vi. The smoker would not need to revert to crimes for supporting smoking.
vii. There would be no need for drug pushers or contraband criminals.
If the government are really interested in saving premature deaths in the community.
Then the government would attempt to
i. Reduce artificial man made chemicals in tobacco products.
ii. Reduce poverty of children by minimal tax on adult visas such as tobacco.
iii. Reduce deaths due to criminal debt collectors, by alleviating drug pushers of adult visas such as tobacco, marijuana and the like.
Other wise it could be considered that the politicians have Altria motives for such a clamp down on smoking.
In conclusion. Is there an air born chemical bacteria that is about to be used to reduce population growth????
Sounds ridicules and fiction?????? May be not. The same ridicules towards
persons who dreamt of fly like a bird, or going to the moon. to suggestion would have been made to there human generation.
Yours sincerely, 070510Posted.
Note When debating politics Fighting over Labor or Liberal policies. with an elderly wise woman she said. “Son, you are a horse!” to which I replied why! “Because a horse has to run. The only difference is a change of jockey on your back” The mottos of the story. No matter which political party one fights for. One has to always pay taxes and serve.. Intelligent voters would say. I prefer a jockey that does not use a whip, a jokey that is light weight, and a jockey that does not neglect the intelligence of voters, or make the elderly like me run in stipple race and jump hurdles. Otherwise we will join the union of bucking or lay down.
You Labor politicians have not looked after me in hospitals, you have not looked after children from violent parents. You tax my water, you tax my electricity, you tax my beer, tax my smokes, you poison me with fruit from over seas. Is there any thing else you can tax before my death.
Give me a good reason why I should vote for you at the next election?
==================
| Thank you for your time. Your comments have been successfully submitted via http://www.aph.gov.au You have sent the following details: Name: Joseph Rossi Address: 87a Findon Road City: Woodville South State: South Australia Postcode: 5011 Country: Australia Telephone Number: 0882430151 Email Address: joerossi48@optusnet.com.au Comments: Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600. Copy Already sent To: The Federal Member for Port Adelaide, Mark.Butler.MP@aph.gov.au Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600. From: Joseph Peter Rossi, Webb www.jp-rossi-politician-sa.info 8th.May 2010. Reference: Tobacco Tax. Dear Mr. Mark.Butler.MP. I like to draw your attention to some History. Introduction: |
To all Face Book readers. Website feedback: Face Book Joseph Peter Rossi. All comments positive or negative is imperative to me. My views are nothing without you supporting them.
Your ideas to any of my topic here could be legally added if you so direct..
For More Media Press Release topics refer to Old Median releases of index page.
Council Topic Press Releases
===================================
on 28/02/2010.
===================================
Topic One
Open Space in Charles Sturt Council Area.
As regards
the Saint Clair land swap and the Cheltenham redevelopment.
The
government Labor Party did implement the 12 percent tax on
subdivision some 30 years ago so as to buy back land for
recreational purposes.
That the Labor Party government has continued to sell
government land in the Charles Sturt Council district for
Residential housing.
That
the 12 percent recreational land has diminished not
increased in the Charles Sturt Council district during the
same time.
While the Local Representatives who are supposed to be independent thinkers for the electorate have bowed to bully boy tactics of the Labor government.
If councillors and Mayors do what the government tells you then we may as well not have these positions that are a cost the ratepayers We may as well abolish local government.
City Councillors in recent times have not looked after playgrounds, not look after subdivision assessments.
City Councillors in recent times have not check foot path conditions or listen to rate payers.
Rubbish collection irresponsibility s now privatized so they do not have that task
Honourable Minister Atkinson mentions some overseas Cities? Frankfurt and the like?
One does not have to look overseas for what high density housing does for ghettos dwellings.
In the early 1980 there was some difficulty getting people to live in the Adelaide City square mile in the late 1980’s. Special incentives had to be given. Also the parking problems are witnessed close hand as no car spot were allocated in the original Adelaide City Square development of the 1800’s. Also an Italian word stretta (street ) means narrow) In Europe they used to use legs for walking and horses for long distances. So street only had to accommodate width of 2 horses not 2 cars 2 meter wide each.
The streets of Bowden and West Lakes are narrow. Not enough for two way traffic, let alone car parking on one side only.
In history train line were built for heavy frequent transfer of goods like coal, factory material and the like which horse trays could not compete efficiently.
People have human legs, horses, cars, motor bikes, and push bikes to travel to the nearest public transport be it buses, trains or trams.
Mr Atkinson is really putting the cart before the horse at St Clair.
If the light rail and tram project hinges only on some 200 houses along a railway at Woodville, then firstly it means the project is ill-conceived., costly and will not work. Secondly how long will it be before the trains will be withdrawn from service and only the trams take over?
Two parallel 15 minute frequency duplicated service can not be justified or patronized by the few western commuters.
It also means that Mr Wetherill mislead the electors at previous elections as he Wetherill set up, encouraged and supported the Cheltenham Race Course Action Group. Now he belittles them. What hypocrites are both Wetherill and Atkinson.
The Labor Party selected councillors knew of the Cheltenham subdivision project before the last council elections and kept it secrete.
Along Railway corridors should be, Hospitals, Libraries, Sporting venues and Schools,
Transport corridors are supposed to get together as many suburbs as possible. It is supposed to get a congregation of people to a few locations in walking distance.
This is not what you councillors are supporting.
===================================
Topic Two
Based on perception and media reports only I make the following allegations
Reference: Mr. Mike Rann denial
Denial of having sex with Parliamentary assistant.
He showed how much of a good block he must be. Compassionate, considerate and not demeaning the girl.
Mr. Don Dunstan said it was not the crime but getting found out is the crime.
Mr. Rann compassionate speech then followed by threatening a
parliamentary enquiry against the Liberal MPs also, if a parliamentary enquiry was set up against Labor. This threat must be taken as political blackmail.
The fact that Mr. Rann has been alleged to be caught in the act of deceiving a husband is the offence.
Does it mean according to Mr. Rann that all car drivers should be investigated because a few have been caught speeding by the police? It is a preposterous thought.. Only the identified offenders are normally investigated and punished.
Mr. Rann got wholloped by Mr. Phillips. Yet was Mr. Rann was meek in receiving the punishment. Mr Rann also said he did not know what the man said and who he was. Mr. Rann still has shown no guilt or admission.
Is it that Mr. Rann after winning the state election in March and if found guilty of Sex allegation he will resign within 6 months so that a unknown politician may take his place in Parliament without a by election.
We need tough decisive consistent direction from persons with consistent thinking. Contestant discipline and consistent authority.
Not these Rann responses “on the advice I have received from experts ”
Mr. Rann then went on about his government creating jobs in South Australia. What happened to the federal stimulus packages?
Wake up Mr. Rann. You can fool some of the people some of the time. But not fool all the people all of the time.
Press Release on 27/02/2010.
===================================
Topic One
What do I stand for:
(1) Democratic representation. do what the voters say
they need)
(2) Better Mental Health Care
(3) Save the Royal Adelaide Hospital.
(4) Keep council and government school owned open
space ratio close to
12 percent. as possible.
(5) Better quicker public Hospital service and higher
hospital medical staff.
(6) More public School social workers to handle children
from domestic violence.
(8) Get ride of dead wood politicians in parliament
(Politicians that do not perform or who have been
in office more than
2 terms and are non-performers. flirt with married partners ,
flirt with democracy and flirt with the truth.
(9) Reduce the number of problem gamblers in the community
who bring about
family breakdowns and family violence
(10) A set ration of police officers to population of the
state.
(more police on the beat required) (More unmarked police cars
required.
Identified car only for controlling traffic and crowds at
functions.)
(11) Court judges to be made accountable for lenient
punishment and
release on bail. Early releasing of repeat offenders,
judges should be
made to pay a fine too, to recover costs for tracking and capturing
the
offender again.
(Managing Directors are fined for
unsafe work environment and
failing to train employees. So why not also
judges?)
(12) Many other issues referred to in this web site in
other topics .
===================================
Topic Two
Failure of the Advertiser and Messenger Press to protect our democracy by not printing views of the little man and little candidates.
Crime thrives when
good people stay quite.
Procrastination is no
road to success.
United we stand .
Divided we fall.
Democracy falls when
Court decision become secrete.
Courts are the
protection between Government Dictatorship
and the
Civilians.
When Courts side with the Government, Democracy
Ends.
The media independence and freedom is the freedom of the civilians. Government control of the media is government control of its citizens.
Name and shame
is the only non-violent control of morally
and bad
behaviour of
humans.
Make our regional candidates and
voters voice be
heard.
Leaders and Ministers have 365 days, 24 hour exposure for
1460 days between elections. Give the rest of us at least 4
days exposure.
We candidates in safe major party seats are like a seed that if allowed to germinate, may be the future leaders in a real democratic world.
In
1984 Joe Rossi
set up the .
"Australian Majority Wishes Political Party Inc."
Dated 23/11/1984 of the then News Newspaper, Pages 72 to 74
inclusive.
Some of the Items mentioned then were, to
mention a few:
(1) Government Financial crises.*2) Fixed
date for elections. (3) Better standard of education in the
3R's (4) Deterioration in political representation of our
politicians.
All of which have come to be implemented by the major parties.
What have the candidates of the other major parties contesting marginal seats published in the media or else where.?
===================================
Topic Three
Is there a possibility of Corruption by politicians.
Based on perception only I make the following allegations
Mr Joe Rossi contested the seat of Lee against Mr. Kevin
Hamilton.
Mr. Kevin Hamilton had his office in 1993 at the same present 2010 location Mr.
Rossi had the office relocated at Clarke Terrace Seaton due to Outside back door
was continual smell from fat laying in sewer pipe from drain of a chicken shop
next door.
Mr. Rossi also represented the voters against the Royal Park Salvage application for a Waste recycling plant at the corner of Tapleys Hill Road and Old Port Road.
The Minister Honourable Michael Wright contested the 1997 election for the seat of Lee against Mr Joe Rossi. Honourable Wright immediately relocated in the same landlord complex as Mr. Hamilton had some 4 years earlier. I question Why.
The other .perception given to the public of possible corruption is why Honourable Wright is still at the same location considering that the redistribution of boundaries as far back as 200, Wright still has not moved location and in fact is outside the electorate boundaries.
The Royal Park Salvage has also been seen to do a lot of work at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital and other government sites Mr. Rossi to his knowledge knew during the application of waste transfer station at Royal Park that the management of Royal Park salvage was a strong Lobar Party supporter.
Questions should be asked what kick backs if any apply with the relationship of Wright and Royal Park Salvage and the Electoral office Landlord
Written by
Joe Rossi without a University $120 thousand a year spin doctor..
What you read is what you get.
No hidden meanings.
Home Ph 08-82430151, Mobile Ph 041-989-5550
E-mail joerossi48@optusnet.com.au
Face book Rannstallion.
Webb www.army-rann-children-courts.com.au
Webb www.jp-rossi-political-sa.info
Joseph Rossi, Campaigner for the protection of emotional and physical abuse or death of children from violent parents.