A well
disciplined political party propaganda election is an environment for
dictatorship.
A hung
parliament is an environment to kill dictatorship mentality.
This 2010
Australian Federal Parliament election
was disciplined.
Both Labor and
Liberal ran a well disciplined political party propaganda in the
Australian Federal election of 2010.
The
LEADERS Said nothing what they were to do for us.. Told nothing about the
history of team players or the positions they would play. .(If there was a
team)
The only
thing the Leaders did was slag on each other. $14 million worth. (verbal
bombs during the election, real bombs after.
(work choice
by Liberals. Land Tax and wage hike by Labor.)
Why
I did not intend to vote.
If the
Electoral Commission intends to take me to court for not voting:
I
intend to submit to the courts as my defense the following reasons::
With
respect your honour I submit the following as my defence of the alleged breach of the said
Electoral ACT.
I did not comply fully to the election process at the
Federal election held on 21/08/2010 because:
,==========,==========,
Reference:
Saturday 21/08/2010 Federal Election:
1)When you have a had a heart attack and are
in emergency dept in a hospital you do not think of foreign boat arrivals. You
are not interested in knowing the government has spent $14 million dollars in
your tax money telling you nothing about what is being done to solve your
problem
2)When you have a had a domestic violence in
the family where the safety of small children under 6 are in danger from the
violent parent you are not interested in the federal or state budget being too
high when safety is the main issue effecting your own situation. You are not
interested in knowing the government has spent $14 million dollars in your tax
money telling you nothing about what is being done to solve your problem
3)When you have a had a family member with a
gambling problem that has spent all the family savings you are not interested in
averment carbon tax but on minimizing gamboling venues and gambling hours
available. You are not interested in knowing the government has spent $14
million dollars in your tax money telling you nothing about what is being done
to solve your problem
4)When you already know what the government
has done negatively you do not need the opposition to tell you the same thing.
You are not interested in knowing the government has spent $14 million dollars
of your tax money telling you nothing about what is being done to solve your
problem.
5)You are interested only in what your local
candidate is going to do for youto solve your problems. You do not need
some one (some Leader) thousands of miles
away how s/he is going to dictate your local candidate/ representative what to
say or do..
6)If a
politician is not obliged to keep his promises or political speeches to :
i.)the political
Party, the Organizational wing cannot dictate
policy but consults with and advises the Parliamentary wing, particularly on the
development of longer-term policies. The Organizational wing is based on the
Party’s paid membership. As exactly Quoted from the Liberal Party web site
ii.)The voter as per the TV,
Radio and newspaper commercials.
iii.)The Candidate's,
politician higher god (supernatural)
Then what is the
use for voting.
7)If the
government political Party have candidates in the senate. One would expect the names, age, tertiary
qualifications, gender, time spent living in the electorate area and marital
status to be available for the voter to make an informed choice. Not one,
(not even the names or higher achy of the candidates) of these information
was issued to the voter on all the major political party "How to vote cards"
The said candidates could very well be any one of
and no one would be the wiser.
8)If the law in
which I am before you and you can not change
but must follow is bound by the wordings within the 4 corners of the pages of
the act. Then:
i.)How come the
politician can conduct
themselves out side parliament as they can inside parliament?
ii.)How come the politician can
manipulate the law of the Australian constitution by including or excluding
the meanings of words or intentions of the constitution?
iii.)As a scenario,
How come we have lawyers to defend clients to the best of their ability when in
practice they do not even attempt or are obliged to do so?
iv.)When I went to the
polling booth again on Saturday to issue How to Vote Cards for an Independent
Upper House Senate. I found that all AND I MEAN all
major Party How to Vote pamphlets just 1 above the line and
NO NAMES.
v.)No where in the
polling booths I visited (about 4) was there a display of how the voting
preferences went below the line of the senate ticket.
vi.)No, one helper, at
the gates of the polling booths issuing how to vote cards could tell me the
names of the senate ticket team.
vii.)I personally did not
receive one political pamphlet showing me the senate political Party Ticket
names and job
resume of the candidates I
was supposed to give my vote.
9)Considering that
when I started voting there was no computers,
i.)Those political candidates
came from the same neighborhood.
ii.)Those political
candidates did more door knocking.
iii.)That all the names
appeared on all major political Party
Pamphlets.
iv.)That political candidates
and politicians were much, much
More honest and with integrity.
v.)That there were 3
independent newspapers in the state of
South Australia and many
more in other states. (Now there is
Only ONE)
vi.)That there were at least
3 independent radio talk back stations.
Now there is 5AA in the true
sense.)
There were privately funded
political campaign funds. (Now there is public money).
In consider
that the political system of democracy has deliberately and systematically been
eroded by the major parties.
10)There is no
reason why the Candidates of the major party senate
team:
i.)Could not speak
independently for themselves on Radio or TV.
ii.)Could not have
photographs on the ballot papers.
iii.)A little personal
history about their back ground.
Considering
that any one of them could be Government Leader in the Upper House. Or be the
next High Court Judge.
Or being
ridicules but possible a candidate with no name on the ballot paper could be a
parrot who can speak or a monkey who can hold up his arm and hand when it comes
to talking or voting in the Australian parliament chambers.
In
conclusion, what is the use of voting? What is the use of using the words
democracy?
By me taking
the steps of being present in this court instead of paying a mere $20 fine is
surely a participation in the voting process to bring about changes for the
better.
By me taking
the steps of being present in this court is similar to the start of the Labor
party on the sheep shearer issues and the Erika stock aid.
In Europe
where governments have been active for some 19 centuries. Where the people were
well educated and much more politically active rose the legally elected Hitler
then transformed dictator. Remember Australia is only some 200 years old and the
electors act like sheep. Changes to the constitution have been made (softly) sutterly by
Prime Minister Whitlam and Keating.
The only thing
I have to say God save us and the Queen. What did Whitlam say about the Governor
General Kerr might well happen to Australia?
11)You sir, I am sure are only interested in
what is happening in this court room first and foremost. You are not interested
in what is happening next door. You either have or have not independent
judgment. That is of foremost importance.
As is my importance in election and my freedom.
Your
honor I should not be punished in action but supported for the sake of
democracy.
(viii.)Common Law – ordinary, universal, customary, shared, familiar,
Collective, joint.
2)Roman
catholic Church Bible Quotes: (Code of Ethics)
The 10
Commandments - God's Revelation in the Old Testament
The 10 Commandments are found in the Bible's Old Testament at Exodus, Chapter
20. They were given directly by God to the people of Israel at Mount Sinai after
He had delivered them from slavery in Egypt:
"And God spoke all these words, saying: 'I am the LORD your God…
ONE: 'You shall have no other gods before Me.'
TWO: 'You shall not make for yourself a carved image--any likeness of
anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in
the water under the earth.'
THREE: 'You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.'
FOUR: 'Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.'
FIVE: 'Honour your father and your mother.'
SIX: 'You shall not murder.'
SEVEN: 'You shall not commit adultery.'
EIGHT: 'You shall not steal.'
NINE: 'You shall not bear false witness against your neighbour.'
TEN: 'You shall not covet your neighbour’s house; you shall not covet your
neighbour’s wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor
his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbour’s'
The 10
Commandments - Christ's Summation in the New Testament
About 1,400 years later, the 10 Commandments were summed up in the New Testament
at Matthew 22, when Jesus was confronted by the religious "experts" of the day:
Labor Party does not have“We Believe.... “on their web site. (This I
take as that they do not have a code of Ethics)
QuoteWho We Are
Party
Members
As a grassroots
community organization, Party members are the core of the Labor Party. Party
members and local branches play a central role in innovative policy development
and passionately working in the community to spread Labor values.
Quote
State Branches
Just as Australia is a
nation of federated states, Australian Labor is a Party of federated branches
from every State and Territory. Each State branch provides organizational
support for the local branches and electorate councils of that State working
closely with the State Labor Parliamentary Groups.
A better
deal for workers
The trade union
movement began in the Australian colonies in the 1860s to get a better deal for
workers. But after repeated defeats by employers, colonial governments and
courts, it became apparent that political power through direct, parliamentary
representation was necessary to implement reforms.
Maritime
and Shearers' Strikes
The turning point was
the maritime and
shearers' strikes in 1890.
The harsh suppression of the strikes demonstrated the limitations of industrial
action and the imperative of political representation. The first branch meeting
of the ALP is said to have been held by striking shearers under the gum tree now
known as the Tree of Knowledge in Barcaldine, Queensland, in 1891. In the same
year, NSW Trades and Labor Council set up 45 Labor Electoral Leagues, the first
being in Balmain. The emerging movement produced the ALP’s first Platform
Quote
State Movements1890: First Meeting Queensland ALF
Separate Labor parties
had been established in the colonies during the 1890s. These parties were
sponsored by the trade union movement to help get sympathetic politicians
elected to colonial parliaments. They contested elections in New South Wales
from 1891, in Queensland and South Australia from 1893, and later in the other
colonies (States). In Western Australia, Tasmania and Victoria, however, there
were no strong and coherent Labor parties until after federation.
In the 1890s, the
parliaments of the colonies were dominated by free-traders and protectionists –
they constituted the opposing forces at the polls and on the floor of the House.
Until the Labor Party was in a position to form government, it therefore chose
to adopt the strategy of providing support in return for concessions – perhaps
in much the same way as third parties do today.
In a breakthrough in 1899,
Anderson Dawson formed a minority Labor government in Queensland, the first in
the world, which lasted one week before the non-Labor forces regrouped.
One plank of an early
Labor Platform was achieved with the enactment of the 1893 Electoral Act in NSW
which enshrined the principle of "one man, one vote". And it really was a
reference to men only in NSW, although women got the vote South Australia in
1893, in Western Australia in 1899, and throughout Australia for federal
elections in 1902.
In 1944, the Liberal Party of Australia was founded after a three-day meeting
held in a small hall not far from Parliament House in Canberra. The meeting was
called by the then Leader of the Opposition (United Australia Party) Robert
Menzies. He had already served as Prime Minister of Australia, but he believed
that the non-Labor parties should... read
more
The Organisational and Parliamentary wings of the Liberal Party each have
clearly defined and separate roles. In the Liberal Party, the Organisational
wing cannot dictate policy but consults with and advises the Parliamentary wing,
particularly on the development of longer-term policies. The Organisational wing
is based on the Party’s paid membership...
QuoteWe Believe... (This I take as
the code of Ethics)
In the inalienable rights and
freedoms of all peoples; and we work towards a lean government that
minimizes interference in our daily lives; and maximizes individual and
private sector initiative
In government that nurtures and
encourages its citizens through incentive, rather than putting limits on
people through the punishing disincentives of burdensome taxes and the
stifling structures of Labor's corporate state and bureaucratic red tape.
In those most basic freedoms of
parliamentary democracy - the freedom of thought, worship, speech and
association.
In a just and humane society in
which the importance of the family and the role of law and justice is
maintained.
In equal opportunity for all
Australians; and the encouragement and facilitation of wealth so that all
may enjoy the highest possible standards of living, health, education and
social justice.
That, wherever possible, government
should not compete with an efficient private sector; and that businesses and
individuals - not government - are the true creators of wealth and
employment.
In preserving Australia's natural
beauty and the environment for future generations.
Thatour nation
has a constructive role to play in maintaining world peace and democracy
through alliance with other free nations.
In short, we simply believe in individual freedom and free enterprise; and if
you share this belief, then ours is the Party for you. (End of Quotes)
,==========,==========,==========,==========,==========,=========,
End of Religious and political Ethics on code of conduct.
5)Abuse of
power by major Party .
Leaders in
Power:
I do not
believe there has been one political leader in history that has not obtained
that position of public life and representative without first following the
legal rules of the community.
However I
also believe that once having obtained the position political leader, that
position of public life and representative, s/he has then through manipulation,
intimidation, and corruption has then remained in power as leader by changing
the legal rules and community standards through propaganda.
Adolph Hitler
and Mussolini just to mention 2 in resent times.
I believe
that the complacency of the Australian people is a good environment for that to
happen here in the not too distant future. Using the exact same method and
procedures adopted elsewhere in Europe during the depressions of the 1910 and
1930’s.
Labor Prime Minister Gillard is
not up to the job of Leading and Governing.
Quoting --GILLARD was quite as DEPUTY
Prime Minister on
Mining Tax gouge., Read Liberal
link., 19/08/10
A re-elected Labor Government will lead to more
destruction for the mining industry now that the Gillard Government’s chief
allies have revealed plans to slug the sector even further. Greens Leader
Senator Bob Brown confirmed at the Press Club...
Labor Australia Prime Minister
Gillard is not up to the job because :.
GILLARD as deputy Prime Minister did not respond
to letters or Emails from constituents about Family Law Act and respond to
protecting small children from violent parents. She could not cope with the work
load then. How can she cope with a bigger load?
For any leader to continually down talk their
party issues and continually spend some $14 million dollars in election TV
commercials on negative issues of the opposition is playing childish,
irresponsible and must not have any honest plans for the future.
It is bad enough for a person who believes in a
higher power (gods) and still commits crime and immoral acts towards neighbours and lies.
How much easier it is for a person who believes s/he has no one else in higher
power to be accountable to be tempted to similar crimes?
I question how many dictators in history were
either Christians who became atheists or were straight out atheists.
We have been told in recent times of the number of
religious priests and religious school teachers that have been found out
committing sexual acts with small alter boys, or students or have been found to
be paedophiles.
I am not implying that present politicians are
corrupt but the potential is higher.( Premier Mike Rann and Deputy Kevin Foley
did allow misleading Family First "how to vote slips being issued at polling
places in the South Australian election March 2010 knowing full well it was an
immoral act if not illegal. Having no fear of punishment from higher up. (gods)
Liberal
Federal Leader Abbott is also not the best for the job of Leading and Governing
because he was arrogant as Minister of Health. He as a Christian abused in my
opinion the ninth commandment against Pauline Hanson under freedom of speech and
fabrication of evidence.
==========,========== end of topic
==========,==========,==========,
Sorry for Some
repetition of the above items.
To:
The Honorable Adelaide Court Magistrate,
With
respect I submit the following as my defence of the alleged breach of the said
ACT.
Following is
a Copy of Actual vote I made at the Port Adelaide Electoral Office
Strike my name off the roll as attended the polling place.
This is my
voting paper.
From:
Joseph Peter Rossi, 87 Findon
Road, Woodville South SA 5011.
This is my opinion of the
candidates on the ballot papers.
Reference:
Australian Government Lack of Democratic Process.
I
hereby lodge a complaint and my voting intentions for the Federal Election
Saturday 21st August 2010.
1)I do not vote
for either major party or any candidates because the electoral commission
prevents me to lodge an informed and a valid communication of my opinion. It
does not give me a square to put an option of recording an unhappy major
party political conduct.
2)Until such
time as the name of the political Leaders appears directly on my voting
paper, I can not call the Australian Federal system of Government election a
democratic process. Neither of the Leaders can be held responsible for
giving me a pledge. When the Leader of a political Party that makes promises
with me can be changed by the party power brokers and not by me (us) as a
voter then it can not be democratic Until such time as the name of the
political Leader appears directly on my voting paper, I can not call the
Australian Federal system of Government a democratic voting process.
3)Neither of
the major party candidates in my electorate is allowed to give a pledge to
me on their personal views. Neither of the major party candidates in my
electorate is allowed to campaign on TV, radio or local newspapers. Without
the fear of being diss endorsed (crabbed off) the major party voting papers.
Nor is it team play when only one person per political party (The Leaders)
are in your face and all do not come from your state or local electorate.
(Neither leader Abbot or Gillard or Brown do not come from my state
electorate or from my (ones) own state.
4)I do not even
have the right to select directly one Minister or shadow minister from my
own state, by voting Number (!) for the individual candidate in the senate
team of a political party. (The candidate gaining the most votes in the
party team) or the house of Representative that can not be changed by the
party Leader this is not democracy but hypocrisy.
5)Neither the
i.)Then Federal
Liberal Treasurer Hon. Costello replies to my letters of concern regarding
bouncing cheques. (did not reply)
ii.)Nor the current
government former Labor Deputy Prime Minister Hon. Gillard reply to
my letters of concern regarding abused children.
iii.)Nor did the
local Labor member for Port Adelaide did not reply to constituents polite
normal letters because the constituent is not his supporter.
6)The
Australian Constitution did not allow for the senate candidates to
form political parties to be sanctioned and told what to do and say inside
or outside parliament.
That is not democracy or the
people’s choice.
That is not one vote one value.
7)That the most
offensive voting process to me has been the present political parties has
been that the election campaigns are funded by me and you the tax payer, (a
certain amount per first preference vote received from each electorate
district.)
Yet the election propaganda is
made by just 3 political leaders who have had prior the issue of the
election rites all the publicity in the media daily and at parliamentary
question time. None of the past back bench politicians or new candidates
have one hundredth of the same opportunity of communicating with their own
electors.
8) I am
concerned with:
i.)The Australian
Liberal Leader is not and was not listed on my ballot voting paper.
ii.)The Australian
Labor Leader is not and was not listed on my ballot voting paper.
iii.)The Australian
Liberal Political Leader can be changed and has been changed in the recent
past by faceless political financial supporters without my input and worse
for that matter without the sanction of the SA state 250 Liberal Delegates.
(Similarly with Prime minister Rudd and Gillian. Of the Labor Party.
iv.)The Australian
Liberal Political Leader and the Australian Labor political Leader have not
been truthful with all the facts with the people and voters of this state
and country during the 2010 Federal media publicity.
I refer to the openness and
easy excess to the Australian Bureau of Censes and Statistic record keeping
or any reference to such information. (Reference number of immigration
growth compared to number of work jobs created. Just to mention 2 examples
out of some minimum of 8.)
9)The two major
political parties have changed the Australian Constitution by deception.
In
Conclusion:
1)That the ballot
voting paper does not allow for ticking a square for “”unhappy with major
parties”” Informal vote is a wasted vote and tell nothing about deliberate
intention.
2)That taking ones
name off the roll at the election booth as attending does not obtain
comments from unhappy voters to give a message to Government Leaders of the
dishonesty, corruption, manipulation, deviate election processes.
I feel uncomfortable
participating in a voting process that gives credibility to the politicians
who give the impression of conducting themselves similar to the High Priest
who took no responsibility for the action as described in the Roman Catholic
Bible who crucified the Lord Jesus.
Based on religious and
political motives I request that my name be struck off the roll. I do not
wish to be party to this process.
Sincerely
Yours
Joe
Rossi
Former SA Public Servant.
Former Member of SA Parliament
for the seat of Lee.
Baptized Member of Roman
Catholic Church.
Above boxed,
was handed in to polling Booth head officer at about 10.00am Head officer took me
into the Port Adelaide Electoral Officer and called the Returning Officer.
The Returning
Officer recommended I follow the laid down voting procedures.
I said I have
attended the polling place and indicated my vote according to my moral
obligation and interpretation of the Australian Constitution.
(in my view the
Constitution is the code of conduct expected from our Australian Political
Leaders)
i.)Did allow
for electors (only land
owners) to vote for independent Senators in state seats. (One vote one value).
ii.)In the
1970’s it changed to all Australian citizens could vote and still one vote one value?
iii.)Did
allow for electors to
vote for independent local member’s .seats.
iv.)Did
allow One vote one value
v.)Did allow
for independent
candidates to fund their own election costs.
vi.)Did allow
for local voter to elect
local members to run in local seats.
vii.)Did allow
for the state senators
to represent the state interests above party interests.
viii.)Did allow
for one vote one value
for state senators to represent the state interests above party interests.
ix.)Did allow
for one vote one value
for state house of Representatives.
x.)The Senate to be
equivalent to the House of Lords. The King/Queens House.
Not the Prime Ministers controlled chamber.
11)The
Australian Constitutiondid not
intend to allow:
i.)For the senate
candidates to form political parties to be sanctioned and told what to do.
ii.)For the House of
Representatives candidates to form political parties to be sanctioned and told
what to do.
iii.)For the political
parties to sanction and tell local newspapers and media what to say and who to
support.
iv.)Political parties to
receive tax payers funds for campaign expenses.
12)The
Australian ConstitutionDid not
allow and does not allow for
i. The Australian
Liberal Party to have some 250 delegates select all 12 candidates for the Senate
and in a set order of preference as a choice to the voters to select from.
ii.This gives the
party delegates one vote for each senate candidate (12) in South Australia. That
means 12 votes before election and one vote on Election Day.
A
total of 13 votes effectively
for 250 citizens out of the SA state population of some 1.5 million.
iii.Similarly
selection of Labor Political candidates applies to the Labor Party delegates.
Making a total of 26 votes
effectivelyamongst 500 citizens
from a state population of some 1.5 million.
iv.The Australian
Liberal Party to have some 250 delegates selects all 12 candidates for the House
of Representatives and in a set order of preference as a choice to the voters to
select from.
This gives the party delegates one
vote for each senate candidate (12) in South Australia. That means 12 votes
before election and one vote on Election Day.
Making a total of all of the
above political 500 delegates each having a vote of 53 to 1 votes effectivelyfrom a state population
of some 1.5 million.
v.Prior to
Systematic Party politics, local candidates were known of their history and
accomplishments by the local voters. Today the candidates can come from
different parts of Australia for a short period of time to contest seats not
in their immediate state or council district, so as to have a gerrymander
and conceal the facts from the voters about their honesty, marital status, and
criminal back ground or otherwise their personal beliefs etcetera. They are directed
what to say and when to say political propaganda.
vi.
Political Party delegates do select candidates not based on honesty but based on being a good
subordinate.
vii.
Former Members of the
Party and members of parliament have not been selected again by the party delegates for no
other reason but loyalty. Even though the election results placed them 12 least
swing from 39 candidate
viii..Former
election candidate Members
of the Party have been dis-indorsed by the party delegates not for not
representing the people and voters but for no other reason but loyalty and
keeping the mouth shut.
ix.The Australian
Constitution did not allow
for the senate
candidates to form political parties to be sanctioned and told what to do and
say inside or outside parliament.
That is not democracy or the
people’s choice.
That is not one vote one value.
13)The
Australian Political Party Candidates background.
i.)Labor party
Candidates did comefrom local industries worker
shop floors.
ii.)The Australian Liberal party
Candidates did come from the local industries management and businesses.
iii.)The then politicians
( 1870’s) had come from a country England that punished its citizens harshly for
trivial crimes such as catching wild animals on private property for food for
one’s self and family.
(Ex convicts).
iv.)The politicians (1950’s) had
come from fighting governments that were under dictatorship, that punished its
citizens harshly for trivial crimes such as expressing an opinion contradicting
the Political Leader. (Were killed or jailed for life). The English and
Australian political Leaders knew what democracy was about and supported the
democratic system with their lives.
( ex War victims)
14)
From the 1980 to the present, political Leaders are people that have come from a
country of plenty.
a)Have Had free or subsidies university
education,
b)Do tolerate
domestic violence and
c)Do tolerate
government control over its citizens.
d)Do tolerate lack
of general Lack of education and family discipline.
e)Have had
politicians like Premier Don Dunstan as a mentor who said ‘it is not the offence
of doing a crime but an offence getting caught.”
f)Have had
politicians like Premier Don Dunstan say one can do what ever s/he likes
provided it does not affect anyone else.
This was and is a complete
contradiction of the law of physics, that every action there is an equal and
opposite reaction. That the world is like a pond, every ripple reaches its
banks. (Some one or something)
I.They have changed the
Australian Constitution by deception.
II.They have had fewer
referenda than ever before to obtain citizens opinions.
III.They have become more
dishonest, more manipulative, use deception in election propaganda.
IV.Most Labor
politicians that say they are Atheists then give speeches that include a God.
V.Most Labor
politicians that say or are Catholics do not take the Oath of office.
VI.Most Labor
politicians that say public ally in election material that they are married and
live within the family unit, in fact are separated.
VII.Most politicians that
say they believe in democracy and free speech, in fact practice “do what I say
and do not do what I do”
15)The
Australian Media of News papers, radio and television.
Prior to the 1960’s
i.)There were
independent newspapers a minimum of 3 in South Australia. The advertiser, The
news and the Messenger Press. Each was interested in political issues and
variety of opinions. There were many more country newspapers. (one per Council
district)
ii.)Prior to the 1960’s
there were independent radio stations, a minimum of 7 in South Australia. Each
was interested in political issues and variety of opinions.
After
the 1980’s
i.)There is only one
newspaper in South Australia. The advertiser. The Messenger Press has become a
subsidiary of the Advertiser. The Advertiser knows what feeds its bank account.
That is the Government of the day and does not bite the hands that feed it.
Many more country newspapers have
now been taken over by the Advertiser as part of the Messenger Press.
ii.)Television stations
have become part of the newspapers group of ownership through the Australian
Stock Exchange and competition again has been compromised where by the
proprietors and one and the same under different corporate names.
Reference:
Australian Government Lack of Democratic Process.
Dear Madam or
Sir:
1) I will not
be voting for this year's 2010 federal election because the electoral commission
prevents me. I can only vote for number 1 on the senate state list and my local
candidate
2) Neither of
which are allowed to campaign nor give a pledge to me on TV or the local
newspapers. This is not democracy. Nor is it team play when only one person per
political party (The Leader) is in your face and all do not come from your state
or local electorate.
3) I do not
even have the right to select directly one Minister from my own state, be it in
the senate or the house of Representative. This is not democracy but hyporacy.
4) Until such
time as the name of the political Leaders appears directly on my voting paper, I
can not call the Australian Federal system of Government election a democratic
process.
5) When the
person that makes promises with me can be changed by the party power brokers and
not by me (us) as a voter then it can not be democratic.
6) Based on
religious and political motives I request that my name be struck off the roll.
He is experienced
in contesting many SA State and Federal elections.
<><>
Quote “I am running for the senate, to
be honest with very little chance of success if the media remain silent on my
candidacy, as most of us have come to expect.
I Hope you all know, I will continue to
fight for my state and country, and I have grand plans for the next state
election, but to have any hope, I do need to do well in this federal election,
and if I were to at the very least secure 4% of the vote, I will be well funded
to do so.
I have studied and fought for many in
the community, from returned soldiers to the most vulnerable in our society like
children in need, the disabled and victims of abuse.
Other issues I have either studied,
written, spoken or held awareness rallies on include, water infrastructure,
power generation, the environment, animal rights (Helen and I run our own Native
Wildlife Sanctuary) Veteran and pension issues, employment and small business,
law and order, Taxation, equal opportunity, social services, mental health
funding, civil and human rights, Equity at law, the list is long and getting
longer…..lol
I have endured a Pokie addiction, the
dreaded family court self represented, supported friends in court fighting for a
fair go, I have been the biggest fighter for electoral reform and democracy in
general, including recently spending a few months in court regarding the conduct
of the state election, uncovering tens of thousands of missing votes.
I have been involved with television
exposes of water theft, employee benefits, and help as many as I can in need,
including supporting children in need both here and overseas.
Ok the use of the letter I, has been
somewhat excessive, but where else do I start, I have met with dozens of boards
and employer organizations, to ensure I have the right knowledge and contacts to
represent you in an informed and fair manner.
Please spread this email with one and
all, I truly understand that I will not be preferred by every one who receives
this, but unfortunately every voter who intends to vote is forced to preference
me, so best they know who I am.
The job of ensuring an informed
electorate goes to the polls, is not yours or mine, it should lay with the
electoral commission and the media, and I will do my best to continue to lobby
for such reform.
Please forward this email, let your
friends know about me, making matters worse, my name will not appear next to the
box above the line on the senate ballot paper, yes I know what a rot, but until
we can change that, not only do you have to help the public know I exist, we
have to educate them that a vote for me above the line is in Blank Box “B”.
All a bit too hard isn’t it, and it
shouldn’t be this way, every elector deserves to know how to vote, who is
running, and every candidate deserves equal rights, but while the major parties
write the laws, we will have to endure structural biases.”
End
of Quote.
,==========,==========,==========,==========,
18)In Democracy:
People that
fight for and die for supporting democracy usually defend themselves against
politicians who talk about democracy but actually practice tyranny.
People
that fight to defend democracy usually believe and practice democracy by not
believing in opponent’s views but give the opponent the right to express
themselves.
In Democracy it is right to whom to vote for.
Not When and
how to vote. (Mark the entire squares etcetera):
1)
Conversely people that say they believe in democracy but practice censorship
upon opponents, actually believe and practice tyranny and dictatorship. (My way
or the highway.)
2)In Democracy the
leaders defend free speech and freedom of association. The Leaders usually
believe and practice the 10 commandment of the Catholic Church which I find are
universal in all religion. Especially,
i.)Thou shall not kill.
ii.)Thou shall not commit adultery,
iii.)Thou shall not bear false witness against thou neighbor.
3)The present
major party political leaders do practice
Bear false witness
against thou neighbor. (Towards each other on election campaigns.)
Bear false witness
against their electorate voters.
,==========,==========,==========,==========,
19)That the
most offensive behavior to me has been the present political parties has been
that the election campaigns are funded by me and you the tax payer, (a certain
amount per first preference vote received from each electorate district.)
Yet
the election propaganda is made by just 3 political leaders who have had prior
the issue of the election rites all the publicity in the media daily and at
parliamentary question time. None of the past back bench politicians or new
candidates have one hundredth of the same opportunity of communicating with
their own electors.
,==========,==========,==========,==========,
In Conclusion:
(Repetitive of above points.)
I am concerned
with:
1)The
Australian Liberal Leader is not and was not listed on my ballot voting paper.
2)The
Australian Labor Leader is not and was not listed on my ballot voting paper.
3)The
Australian Liberal Political Leader can be changed and has been changed in the
recent past by faceless political financial supporters without my input and
worse for that matter without the sanction of the SA state 250 Liberal
Delegates. (similarly with Prime Minister Rudd and Gillian. Of the Labor Party.
4)The Australian Liberal Political Leader and the Australian Labor political
Leader have not been truthful with all the facts with the people and voters of
this state and country during the 2010 Federal media publicity.
or quoted
figures from the Australian Bureau of Senses and Statistic.
I refer to the
openness and easy excess to the Australian Bureau of Senses and Statistic record
keeping or any reference to such information. (Reference number of immigration
growth compared to number of work jobs created. Just to mention 2 examples out
of some minimum of 8.)
5)That the ballot voting paper does not allow for ticking a square for “”unhappy
with major parties”” Informal vote is a wasted vote and tell nothing about
deliberate intention or valuations of candidates.
6)That taking ones name off the roll at the election booth as attending does not
comments from unhappy voters to give a message to Government Leaders of the
dishonesty, corruption, manipulation, deviate election processes.
7)Surviving in politics is based on how much dirt one has on opponents within the
political party and outside the party.
It is not based
on cleanliness or honesty.
8)The
Australian Liberal Political Leader and the Australian Labor political Leader
have not been truthful with all the facts with the people and voters of this
state and country
,==========,==========,==========,==========,
If the
electoral Commission intends to take me to court for not voting I will seek from
the Magistrate
That no
fine be imposed on me as
i.) I
did inform the electoral office of my voting.
ii.) My
vote is not equal to those of the Political party delegates contrary to the
Australian Constitution and or the SA State Constitution.
iii.) That
through the court is the only way voters can give reasons and opinions about
Political Leaders leading to dictatorship and corruption
iv.) I felt uncomfortable to vote as the politicians give the
impression of conducting themselves similar to the High Priest described in the Roman Catholic Bible who crucified the Lord Jesus. For which I want no part.
People went to
war in the 1910's and 1940's to fight for freedom of speech and association.
Millions of lives were lost. Some were followers of Dictatorial Leaders others
died as defenders of the suppressed. Democracy is just not nice word,
politically correct term but a principle that all should uphold for and towards
each other. If one agrees or disagrees with what is being said. Anything less is
a fungus for quick deterioration of not only speech but behavior and racism.
My means of
objecting to the Australian Federal Act and interpretation by
irresponsible political Leader.
My
public duty to fight for the remaining practising little democracy we have left.
There
is a large different between the theory of democracy and the actual
implementation and procedure of democracy.
Sincerely Yours
Joe Rossi
From those who
support dictators, oppositions are called traitors and should be shot.
From those who
support freedom, oppositions to dictators are called freedom fighters or dissidents,
,==========,==========,==========,==========,==========,=========,
End on my views on Voting at Federal election 2010.
Article POSTED on 09/04/2010.
=============================
HOW TO VOTE JOE ROSSIIndependent
Liberal.
House of Assembly
District of Lee
Briton Bob , Independent Communist
Wright Michael John, Labor
2
Gow Sue, Liberal
Thomas Colin Independent Community
Joshi Yesha, Green
1
Joe Rossi, Independent Liberal
Bunting Richard, Family First
Printed and Authorized by Joe Rossi, 87 Findon Rd Woodville
South 5011
Ph 82430151
For your vote to count, all boxes must be filled in,
in the order that you prefer.
=============================
I have only one choice in filling the recommended way to
vote with the electoral Commission.
You the Readers have the following choices of HOW to vote{.
Liberal Voters.
By Voting (1) Gow and (2) Rossi . You have one slight
chance of getting Wright out.
(Race betting terms On the nose)
By Voting (1) Rossi and (2) Gow . You have two chance of getting Wright
out.
(Race betting terms Daily Double or Quenelle)
Labor Voters.
By Voting (1) Wright and (2) Rossi . You have one
chance of getting Wright in.
By Voting (1) Rossi and (2) Wright . You have two chance of getting Wright
or a moderator in .
But not your most disliked opponent. =============================
What do I stand for:
(1) Democratic representation. do what the voters say
they need) (2) Better Mental Health Care (3) Save the Royal Adelaide Hospital. (4) Keep council and government school owned open
space ratio close to 12 percent. as possible. (5) Better quicker public Hospital service and higher
hospital medical staff. (6) More public School social workers to handle children
from domestic violence. (8) Get ride of dead wood politicians in parliament (Politicians that do not perform or who have been
in office more than 2 terms and are non-performers. flirt with married partners ,
flirt with democracy and flirt with the truth. (9) Reduce the number of problem gamblers in the community
who bring about family breakdowns and family violence (10) A set ration of police officers to population of the
state. (more police on the beat required) (More unmarked police cars
required. Identified car only for controlling traffic and crowds at
functions.) (11) Court judges to be made accountable for lenient
punishment and release on bail. Early releasing of repeat offenders,
judges should be made to pay a fine too, to recover costs for tracking and capturing
the
offender again. (Managing Directors are fined for
unsafe work environment and failing to train employees. So why not also
judges?) (12) Many other issues referred to in this web site in
other topics .
It is good to have a brain of
an ant and eyes of a hawk.
You sense
the rain coming days before and you see
events happen from a far.
===================================
Failure of the Advertiser and
Messenger Press to protect our democracy by not printing
views of the little man and little candidates.
Crime thrives when
good people stay quite. Procrastination is no
road to success. United we stand .
Divided we fall.
Democracy falls when
Court decision become secrete. Courts are the
protection between Government Dictatorship and the
Civilians. When Courts side with the Government, Democracy
Ends.
The media independence
and freedom is the freedom of the civilians. Government
control of the media is government control of its citizens.
Name and shame
is the only non-violent control of morally and bad
behaviour of
humans.
Make our regional candidates and
voters voice be
heard. Leaders and Ministers have 365 days, 24 hour exposure for
1460 days between elections. Give the rest of us at least 4
days exposure.
We candidates
in safe major party seats are like a seed that if
allowed to germinate, may be the future leaders
in a real democratic world.
In 1984 Joe Rossi
set up the .
"Australian Majority Wishes Political Party Inc."
Dated 23/11/1984 of the then News Newspaper, Pages 72 to 74
inclusive.
Some of the Items mentioned then were, to
mention a few: (1) Government Financial crises.*2) Fixed
date for elections. (3) Better standard of education in the
3R's (4) Deterioration in political representation of our
politicians.
All of which have come to be implemented by
the major parties.
What have
the candidates of the other major parties contesting
marginal seats published in the media or else where.?
In my travels I have jokingly said to people complaining
about the government that they got what they voted for.
Some people have taken offence to my implication because how did I know who
they voted for when in fact they told me that they have not voted in the
past 3 elections.
My Defence was that if they voted their vote was not right for the right
candidates, and if they did not vote then they did not counteract vote count for
those that did vote for the wrong candidates. In my view it is very important to
vote intelligently for the candidates that you either know their integrity or
those people that are rumoured to have had some work, family or long time life
experiences.
(Crime thrives when
good people stay quite)
I strongly believe that candidates who are young and inexperienced
are very easily convinced by so called lobby groups to pass laws that are ill
conceived, self centred and not for the benefit of the community at large.
The young inexperienced politician is convince by the last person debating a
case with them without knowing the history or reality of the facts. An example
is the Gambling Poker machine and the Family SA government handling of troubled
children.
With experience one does not need to be convinced. One knows the facts and
implements laws to make situations better for others in the community.
My Promise as at 09/03/2010.
I, Joseph Peter Rossi am standing as an Independent Liberal candidate for the
seat of Lee.
I am asking for your support to provide you an Independent,
new approach to local representation and what happens in the community is
important and needs to be taken seriously.
Under Labor Governments we are neglected.
Under Labor Governments, Open space for our children sports
is being sold.
The Labor Government responds to local concerns with
threats of defamation suits instead of taking the time to listen to why people
are so upset.
Certainly the current Labor member has failed us.
As a Independent experienced Politician I spoke out about
your concerns during 1993 to 1997 when I last represented you.
I make one promise which is not hard to keep. I will
keep representing the people of Lee first and foremost.
I will also intend to keep you informed of any laws that
may deteriorate the freedom of democracy.
Your voice should count. Your vote must count.
My promise is simple. Repeat
publicly what you want me to say.
Vote publicly the way you want me to.
Written
and given by Joe Rossi
without any of some 7 University $120 thousand a year RANN spin doctors.
What you read is what
you get.
No hidden meanings.
Article POSTED on 30/12/2009.
Why You should Change Your Vote?
Politicians Were better before the 1960's Do not vote for Michael D. Rann
=============================
Premier Rann, Treasurer Foley, Attorney General Atkinson, and
Minister Conlon are the four worst arrogant Minister the South Australian
Parliament has.
These are the same
people that the media report as the best performer.
The media seem to forget
that the bullies in Parliament can also be the bullies in the electorate. As the
old saying manners start at home, so true and so it applies in the chambers of
parliamentary democracy.
Contempt for the
opposition is contempt for the voters.
Rann and company have
refused to have a transparent Budget, transparent legislation and in my opinion
have used blackmail towards the opposition.
Quote "if there is to be a
Royal Commission into Labor behaviour so too should there be into the Liberals."
We in South Australia and
in Australia in general can not allow these type of persons to remain in
Parliament.
===================================
(1)Politicians used to be:
i.Living in local area.
ii.Local Business men and women.
Farmers, lawyers, Medical
doctors, sometimes uneducated, but successful
economic survivors
iii.Local Union representatives.
v.Well known to local voters as
family persons, neighbours, and if they had integrity.
vi.
Stood for election after having experienced life and knowing what needed to be
changed.
vii.
Stood for election at the age of 40 onwards..
(2)Politicians used to fight for:
i.Local issues..
ii. Issues
they personally experienced that needed change for their own interests or that
of the community.
iii.Independent Local thinking.
(3)Politicians used to fund:
i.
There own campaigns.
ii.
Have local people issue "How to vote cards"
iii.Have Local people donate time and
money for their own issues.
v.The funding donors and
helpers were well know to the community.
(4)Politicians since the 1960's are:
i.Bought at the time of Party pre-selection,
because they
are obliged to comply with the political ''party machine''.
ii.
The political Party machine is already bought by the faceless men and women that
donate money for political campaigns.
ii.
The Political Party machine is already bought by the faceless men and women
of directors of multinational companies that donate money for political champagnes
which
may not
even
live
in Australia.
v.The politicians themselves in
many cases are (selected and live) outside the area of local community or
even out side the local Government Boundaries.
I.e.. Michael Wright lives at Glenelg and the Electorate office is in Cheltenham.
Michael Rann lives in Norwood but
represents Salisbury...
vi.
Political candidates in recent times come straight out of university
education
at about the age of 25
and work for existing politicians.
vii. The political candidates in recent times come straight out of
existing politicians offices at about the age of 35.
They
have had no real accounting, business,
real self independent
work or family
upbringing experiences.
Which reminds me when I was 18 telling my father he was from
the old times,
father had 10
years less education than me.
So, therefore, I knew more and could invent
new things.
Only
to find out at the age of 38, that I was only trying to reinvent t
he wheel.
ix.
The Present political candidates therefore have had no real work
experience.
x.The present political
candidates have not had any great value added
successful enterprises to judge
themselves or
the voter to judge them.
xi.The present political candidates only choose
they made for
themselves are:
(a) Find a marriage partner. For which in most cases they have
failed and have
undergone separation.
(b) Bought a family home. For which in most cases they have
not completed paying
it freehold
before they enter parliament.
xii.The
present political candidates only experiences they have
about politics are:
(a) Have dirt on potential opposition candidates.
(b) Having gained media favours from journalists.
(c) Having built the art of media doctoring, (twisting the truth)
(d) Flirting with members of the opposite sex and employees at that.
(I am quoting Premier Rann)
Analysing and quoting President Clinton " I did not have sex "
with his office girl.
Technically he was right.
Having Sex in my view is an act to repopulate
(reproduce) the
species.
Anything else is foreplay, flirting etcetera.
xiii.The
present political candidates have not had to work towards :
(a) gaining respect from local electors.
(b) gaining respect from extend family members.
(c) gaining respect from their own marriage partners.
(d) gaining respect from their own children
(e) gaining respect from their own business acquaintances.
xiv.Finally.
(a) Voting for political team players does give variety views in Parliamentary
debates and Law implementations.
May not give you all what you want if any of what you want.
Do not blame the politicians or the media for your
unhappiness about
being represented.
(b) If you believe in team players . Then your candidate
is doing just that. He
/ She may as well not be in
parliament.
We may as well vote for the 13 Ministers only and save
the rest of the
wages for
hospitals and education.
(c) If you only listen to the media and vote according to
what you are told by
your political leader.
Then do not expect any more than that from your local
political representative.
(Birds of a feather fly together) Meaning: you select
persons like your self,
(You follow, they follow.).
(d) Voting the way you wish does make a difference in
the way our leaders treat
us.
We are either follow them like sheep or we stand up
for our rights.
If you Bar like a sheep. Walk slowly like a sheep.
You follow like a sheep.
Then be ready to be slaughtered like a sheep.
(e) Voting for independents does slow down the contempt
from the major parties.
(f) Voting for independent thinkers does give variety views in
Parliamentary
debates and Law implementations.
(g) Voting for independent thinkers may not give you all what
you want. But will
give you some of what you want.
Watch out. This
article may be about you in a few years
time?
THE HANGMAN
By Maurice Ogden
Into our town the hangman
came,
smelling of gold and
blood and flame.
He paced our bricks with
a different air,
and built his frame on
the courthouse square.
The scaffold stood by the
courthouse side,
only as wide as the door
was wide
with a frame as tall, or
a little more,
than the capping sill of
the courthouse door.
And we wondered whenever
we had the time,
Who the criminal? What
the crime?
The hangman judged with
the yellow twist
of knotted hemp in his
busy fist.
And innocent though we
were with dread,
we passed those eyes of
buckshot lead.
Till one cried, "Hangman,
who is he,
for whom you raised the
gallows-tree?"
Then a twinkle grew in
his buckshot eye
and he gave a riddle
instead of reply.
"He who serves me best,"
said he
"Shall earn the rope on
the gallows-tree."
And he stepped down and
laid his hand
on a man who came from
another land.
And we breathed again,
for another's grief
at the
hangman's hand, was
our relief.
And the gallows frame on
the courthouse lawn
by tomorrow's sun would
be struck and gone.
So we gave him way and no
one spoke
out of respect for his
hangman's cloak.
The next day's sun looked
mildly down
on roof and street in our
quiet town;
and stark and black in
the morning air
the gallows-tree on the
courthouse square.
And the hangman stood at
his usual stand
with the yellow hemp in
his busy hand.
With his buckshot eye and
his jaw like a pike,
and his air so knowing
and business-like.
And we cried, "Hangman,
have you not done,
yesterday with the alien
one?"
Then we fell silent and
stood amazed.
"Oh, not for him was the
gallows raised."
He laughed a laugh as he
looked at us,
"Do you think I've gone
to all this fuss,
To hang one man? That's
the thing I do.
To stretch the rope when
the rope is new."
Above our silence a voice
cried "Shame!"
and into our midst the
hangman came;
to that mans place, "Do
you hold," said he,
"With him that was meat
for the gallows-tree?"
He laid his hand on that
one's arm
and we shrank back in
quick alarm.
We gave him way, and no
one spoke,
out of fear of the
hangman's cloak.
That night we saw with
dread surprise
the
hangman's scaffold had
grown in size.
Fed by the blood beneath
the chute,
the gallows-tree had
taken root.
Now as wide, or a little
more
than the steps that led
to the courthouse door.
As tall as the writing,
or nearly as tall,
half way up on the
courthouse wall.
The third he took, we had
all heard tell,
was a usurer..., an
infidel.
And "What" said the
hangman, "Have you to do
with the
gallows-bound..., and he a Jew?"
And we cried out, "Is
this one he
who has served you well
and faithfully?"
The hangman smiled, "It's
a clever scheme
to try the strength of
the gallows beam."
The fourth man's dark
accusing song
had scratched our comfort
hard and long.
"And what concern," he
gave us back,
"Have you ... for the
doomed and black?"
The fifth, the sixth, and
we cried again,
"Hangman, hangman, is
this the man?"
"It's a trick", said he,
"that we hangman know
for easing the trap when
the trap springs slow."
And so we ceased and
asked now more
as the hangman tallied
his bloody score.
And sun by sun, and night
by night
the gallows grew to
monstrous height.
The wings of the scaffold
opened wide
until they covered the
square from side to side.
And the monster cross
beam looking down,
cast its shadow across
the town.
Then through the town the
hangman came
and called through the
empty streets...my name.
I looked at the gallows
soaring tall
and thought ... there's
no one left at all
for hanging ... and so
he called to me
to help take down the
gallows-tree.
And I went out with right
good hope
to the
hangman's tree and
the hangman's rope.
He smiled at me as I came
down
to the courthouse
square...through the silent town.
Supple and stretched in
his busy hand,
was the yellow twist of
hempen strand.
He whistled his tune as
he tried the trap
and it sprang down with a
ready snap.
Then with a smile of
awful command,
He laid his hand upon my
hand.
"You tricked me Hangman."
I shouted then,
"That your scaffold was
built for other men,
and I'm no henchman of
yours." I cried.
"You lied to me Hangman,
foully lied."
Then a twinkle grew in
his buckshot eye,
"Lied to you...tricked
you?" He said "Not I...
for I answered straight
and told you true.
The scaffold was raised
for none but you."
"For who has served more
faithfully?
With your coward's hope."
said He,
"And where are the others
that might have stood
side by your side, in the
common good?"
"Dead!" I answered, and
amiably
"Murdered," the Hangman
corrected me.
"First the alien ...
then the Jew.
I did no more than you
let me do."
Beneath the beam that
blocked the sky
none before stood so
alone as I.
The Hangman then strapped
me...with no voice there
to cry "Stay!" ... for me
in the empty square.
THE BOTTOM LINE: "...I did no more than
you let me do."
===================================
Mick Atkinson SA Attorney General email to me on
Sun 31/01/2010 1:44 PM
Dear Joe
The Gypsy Jokers Motorcycle Gang offered you their endorsement to run against me in the State District of Croydon. You thought about accepting it and then you refused. Why ?
Mick Atkinson
From: Joe Rossi [mailto:joerossi48@optusnet.com.au] Sent: Thursday, 21 January 2010 11:27 AM To: " \(mailto:ramsay@parliament.sa.gov.au\)"@mail01.syd.optusnet.com.au Cc: Croydon EO; WEEKLY TIMES EDITOR Subject: David & Goliath Challenge
If Freedom Australia is full of Bikies and represent bikies who then represent crime, drugs and violence. Then Rann Labor have had members of the FAMILY and the building site gate crushes of the BLF and Rann helped destroy the Pink police Files under Police Commissioner Harold Salisbury
Or does Premier Mike Rann dislike competition from the bikies?
The what do politicians represent? The following.
The benevolent dictator is a more modern version of the classical “enlighteneddespot”, being an absolute ruler who exercises his or her political power for the benefit of the people rather than exclusively for his or her own benefit. Like many political classifications, this term suffers from its inherent subjectivity. Such leaders as Napoleon Bonaparte, Anwar Sadat, Alfredo Stroessner, Kenneth Kaunda, Józef Piłsudski, Ion Antonescu, Miklós Horthy, Deng Xiaoping, Omar Torrijos, Park Chung-hee and Sukarno have been characterized by their supporters as benevolent dictators. In Spanish, the word dictablanda is sometimes used for a dictatorship conserving some of the liberties and mechanisms of democracy. (The pun is that, in Spanish, dictadura is “dictatorship”, dura is “hard” and blanda is “soft”). Some examples includes Yugoslavia under Josip Broz Tito or Spain under Francisco Franco. This contrasts with democradura (literally “hard democracy”), characterized by full formal democracy alongside limitations on constitutional freedoms and human rights abuses, frequently within the context of a civil conflict or the existence of an insurgency. Governments in Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Eritrea, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Mexico, Peru and Venezuela have at various times been considered régimes by different critics and opposition groups, not necessarily with an academic or political consensus about the application of the term emerging.
The police are scared to talk about their work.
The teachers are scared to talk about government policies.
parents are not allowed to criticize Family SA Minister.
All this means we in Australia are becoming a Nazi state.